Earlier quoted context omitted.
Eh I think the impact of the federal government on undergraduate costs is largely overstated. The limits for dependent students, which is most undergrads, is really small over 4 years. https://studentaid.gov/understand-aid/types/loans/subsidized... You can only borrow $31k over 4 years. That isn't a lot at all.
Wait, what? That is a misleading read of that page. Only if you have parents/guardians that can get a PLUS loan is that the limit. You have to look at the other column for everyone else. And that is the principal. With a short limit on how much of that can be subsidized, meaning the rest is accruing interest from day 1. Such that they amount you would owe will be laughably higher than even that number after your scho…
Tuition costs have risen 710% since 1983
101–110 of 771 posts
Re: Tuition costs have risen 710% since 1983
#102Makes sense when you have student loans backed by the federal government. If an 18 year old with no money and no credit history gets accepted into a qualifying university, she will be able to receive a loan since the bank knows that the government will protect their investment if she fails to pay them back. So now young people have this easy access to credit, and universities can greatly increase tuition and fees wit…
Re: Tuition costs have risen 710% since 1983
#103Earlier quoted context omitted.
I will say it again: Private high school costs have also gone up astronomically and there are no federal loans for them. [0] https://educationdata.org/average-cost-of-private-school
What is the rate of increase, and how does it compare to CPI inflation?
Re: Tuition costs have risen 710% since 1983
#104https://scaleatucla.weebly.com/uploads/2/9/9/2/29923337/4935...
stanford has more administrators than undergrads now.
administrator growth is like a cancer
Re: Tuition costs have risen 710% since 1983
#105Can we talk about the inflation related to the value of the degree as well? A college degree in 1983 is worth alot more than one in 2023.
The entire point of an education is to make you a good worker/citizen. That's it. People completely lose sight of this and think that the point of an education is to get a degree.
Therefore we end up with legions of kids trying to "get a degree" as opposed to "become a good worker/citizen".
Re: Tuition costs have risen 710% since 1983
#106Earlier quoted context omitted.
If only governments could make…laws to restrict the price of University. Or…could limit the maximum loan size thus encouraging Universities to not charge more than that.
Proper solution is government to stop guaranteeing the loans and to allow people to put them in bankruptcy. Prices will collapse to what people are willing to pay in real time, or save up for.
Re: Tuition costs have risen 710% since 1983
#107Re: Tuition costs have risen 710% since 1983
#108Makes sense when you have student loans backed by the federal government. If an 18 year old with no money and no credit history gets accepted into a qualifying university, she will be able to receive a loan since the bank knows that the government will protect their investment if she fails to pay them back. So now young people have this easy access to credit, and universities can greatly increase tuition and fees wit…
Worse than just "backed by the federal government," the loans are basically protected by the government. Being one of the small list of things you can't bankrupt out of, the risk in giving out the loans has been fully pulled from the lenders. It is frustrating to hear the discourse over the inappropriate students that are taking on too much debt, all the while ignoring the lenders that are taking on too much risk. At…
Re: Tuition costs have risen 710% since 1983
#109Main cause: Government-backed student loans. While it is technically the student paying, in reality the money is going (indirectly) from the federal reserve to the universities. Everyone loves free government money... The fact the student may never pay off those loans (and hence the government foots the bill) is the cherry on top.
I will say it again: Private high school costs have also gone up astronomically and there are no federal loans for them. [0] https://educationdata.org/average-cost-of-private-school
Re: Tuition costs have risen 710% since 1983
#110Earlier quoted context omitted.
Eh I think the impact of the federal government on undergraduate costs is largely overstated. The limits for dependent students, which is most undergrads, is really small over 4 years. https://studentaid.gov/understand-aid/types/loans/subsidized... You can only borrow $31k over 4 years. That isn't a lot at all.
This for federal loans. But the government has "protected" all loans - private education loans are also unable to be discharged by bankruptcy, for example.
the government is not on the hook if a student defaults on a private loan. the critique was that tax payers were somehow on the hook for most undergraduate costs when $31k over 4 years barely pays for rent at this point.