Live data from Hacker News

Erdogan Promises to Transfer Power Peacefully If He Loses Ballot

bloomberg.com

101–103 of 103 posts

Re: Erdogan Promises to Transfer Power Peacefully If He Loses Ballot

#101
post #98

Yeah, sure. We have the same kind of guy in Belarus. Google "Belarus election 2020" - this is what possible for Turkey.

Had. Officially Lukashenko is in hospital since yesterday, but rumors say he is dead for couple of days now - drank too much putin's tea it seems.

This seems like enormous news. Lukashenko is Europe’s last true dictator.

Re: Erdogan Promises to Transfer Power Peacefully If He Loses Ballot

#102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We may never know the actual reason, but we can speculate, and I'm sure reality is somewhere between the extremes. The published story is that S400 systems would be able to repeatedly profile F-35 low-observable aircraft. Eventually a probability model could be created from all of these radar returns. Turkey claims that no data would be sent back to Russia, but that was up for debate. I'm sure there's an element of t…

> We may never know the actual reason, but we can speculate Democracy manifest. > a probability model could be created from all of these radar returns So.. we built a weapon system who's utility is immediately reduced by the amount of time it spends in proximity to enemy radar systems? Then, we tried to use that same weapon system's manufacturing base as a means to create worldwide political allies? And now.. because…

> So.. we built a weapon system who's utility is immediately reduced by the amount of time it spends in proximity to enemy radar systems?

It's a far more complicated situation. Short answer: No. That's a naive perception of how "stealth" aircraft work.

First, it's unlikely that the F35 will ever be susceptible to a weapons grade radar lock for the frequencies in which it was designed to be low observable in. However, detecting that an F35 is present is quite useful for adversaries. These would be on non-targetable frequencies. It's in the best interest of the F35 operators to make sure that it's return signature in those frequency bands is a bit of a mystery. In fact, this is so important, that F35s are generally flown around with _intentional_ radar reflectors during all non-combat operations to keep the aircraft observable.

Second, (this is speculation I want to make that clear its my opinion) 5th generation fighters are likely "as good as it's going to get" for a long time. Within 25 years, every country will be able operate low-observable aircraft, barring some breakthroughs in quantum physics. Extending the time it takes other countries to catch up makes the investment pay out longer.

I really didn't have a good grasp on this stuff until I read up on the LRASM weapon. It's an anti-ship cruise missile fired hundreds of miles away from a moving target. During its its terminal phase, it's able to use its radar to seek its target, even if the target warship is using civilian vessels as human shields. How exactly it does this is of course classified, but military analysts (your favorite word, I know) have surmised its clandestine radar operations have been taken profiles of ships from likely enemies vs radar returns from merchant vessels. Does that comparison sort of make sense?

Re: Erdogan Promises to Transfer Power Peacefully If He Loses Ballot

#103
post #68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The US does seem particularly skittish about prosecuting naughty politicians, tho.

I am not sure if U.S is unique in this though. Rich, powerful people can get away with a whole lotta stuff that ordinary people cannot, in most parts of the world.

Nah, it's definitely not unique in it, but, given that it's a developed democracy with an independent (YMMV based on state; terms and conditions apply) judiciary, it's very much on the "reluctant to annoy the important politicians" side.
Post reply on HN