Earlier quoted context omitted.
You are describing StarLink once they get laser-based relaying between satellites working.
StarLink is beholden to at least one major power and directly has business interests exposed to something like 50 more. Its mercurial owner has more obligations and does not want retaliation against his other struggling businesses. For example, if someone protests in China do you really think he’s going to risk Tesla’s investments on their behalf? Also, consider that ratio triangulation is a century-old technique. It…
Internet disrupted in Pakistan amid arrest of former PM Imran Khan
101–110 of 437 posts
Re: Internet disrupted in Pakistan amid arrest of former PM Imran Khan
#102“Show me a man that gets rich by being a politician, and I'll show you a crook” -Truman
Bill and Hillary Clinton. Mega-rich after decades of public service, lol.
Re: Internet disrupted in Pakistan amid arrest of former PM Imran Khan
#103Contrary to popular belief, at least in my country (India). I feel bad for the citizens of Pakistan. There has not been a single stint of govt that has lasted peacefully since independence. A country can never grow without a peaceful transfer of power, and constant political imbalance will just not allow anything to advance. A shared history/culture with us and it's a shame our govts have differences. We fought toget…
> drifted apart is a kind way of framing "were partitioned intentionally to foment division, by the departing colonizers"
The brits were to blame for process of partition (or lack there-of). The haste, wanton disregard for life, the casual approach towards the largest refugee crisis in human history was certainly avoidable. They were also to blame for further exacerbating divisions via divide-and-conquer.
But the divisions already existed. The idea of a Muslim state had had been stewing for decades in certain circles. It was inevitable.
Re: Internet disrupted in Pakistan amid arrest of former PM Imran Khan
#104Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
Please do not take HN threads into nationalistic flamewar, or any other kind of flamewar. It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Re: Internet disrupted in Pakistan amid arrest of former PM Imran Khan
#105Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, but we're not talking about Starlink. I'm talking about Othernet, which I mentioned above. It is receive only-- not an uplink. (I'm sure a tiny bit of RF leaks out of the LNB, but that could be mitigated as it is not designed for stealth).
> I'm sure a tiny bit of RF leaks out of the LNB Any receiver using the heterodyne principle (this includes most current digital radio modems) is trivially detected by its local oscillator, often to some considerable range (potentially hundreds of metres). In the UK, the BBC used to exploit this, with radio detection vans patrolling the streets for unauthorized receivers, to fine people for watching TV without a lice…
I'm sorry. This is not intrinsic; this is a design choice. Yes, most LOs just care about getting under legal emission masks, but there's nothing to prevent one from bringing it much lower.
Further, as I explained: the LO frequency of the LNB for the first conversion is often the exact same frequency as you'd use to downconvert digital TV broadcast.
> In the UK, the BBC used to exploit this, with radio detection vans patrolling the streets for unauthorized receivers, to fine people for watching TV without a license.
They never found anyone in a way that could be used for prosecution. "A freedom of information act has revealed that TV Detector vans have never to date provided evidence to be used in court against the TV Licence Non-payer, and have therefore never succeeded in enforcing the TV licence."
Re: Internet disrupted in Pakistan amid arrest of former PM Imran Khan
#106Earlier quoted context omitted.
While imperial Britain has much to take blame for in South Asia, the partition is not really one of them. Great Britain (or rather Mountbatten on its behalf) really just acted as a third party arbiter in the partition. It was Jinnah's insistence on a separate carveout for Muslims in South Asia, together with Nehru's refusal to meet any demands for federalism, that resulted in partition. Imperial Britain had nothing t…
> While imperial Britain has much to take blame for in South Asia, the partition is not really one of them. I’m going to disagree; however little direct control they exert at that point, the imperial power always bears significant responsbility for the costs of problems that accompany imperial collapse.
It is hard to be honest about our faults and easy to blame others. Balance that against total erasure of the past - denial is rife.
The present controls the past.
Re: Internet disrupted in Pakistan amid arrest of former PM Imran Khan
#107Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, but we're not talking about Starlink. I'm talking about Othernet, which I mentioned above. It is receive only-- not an uplink. (I'm sure a tiny bit of RF leaks out of the LNB, but that could be mitigated as it is not designed for stealth).
> I'm sure a tiny bit of RF leaks out of the LNB Any receiver using the heterodyne principle (this includes most current digital radio modems) is trivially detected by its local oscillator, often to some considerable range (potentially hundreds of metres). In the UK, the BBC used to exploit this, with radio detection vans patrolling the streets for unauthorized receivers, to fine people for watching TV without a lice…
Such a device would likely look peculiar enough to be easily recognizable, though, so you'll need to hide it, possibly inside some innocuous-looking other device or enclosure.
The whole setup becomes somehow more involved, but still cheap enough.
Re: Internet disrupted in Pakistan amid arrest of former PM Imran Khan
#108Scrolling through the comments, Imran was arrested for accepting bribes worth billions while in office. Some comments say it's true, the other it's false charges. Does anybody have a credible source for what's really going on? The point of propaganda is not to make people believe it. It is to foster cynicism so that we don’t know what to believe and come to believe that nothing is true, no facts are reliable, and the…
Imran is currently ushering in an 'Arab Spring' style movement in Pakistan. I use that phrase with all the positive and negative connotations that go with it. The army wants to maintain dictatorial-ish control and want to do to Imran what they've done to every Pakistani leader before this. (prison /exile/assassination) But he is too popular, now riding a fundamentalist wave that he himself can't control. So the army is having to resort to increasingly contrived methods to keep Imran under control.
I'll answer the question you presumably want to ask : "who are the baddies?". Sadly, that's a question that only the future can answer.
Re: Internet disrupted in Pakistan amid arrest of former PM Imran Khan
#109Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I'm sure a tiny bit of RF leaks out of the LNB Any receiver using the heterodyne principle (this includes most current digital radio modems) is trivially detected by its local oscillator, often to some considerable range (potentially hundreds of metres). In the UK, the BBC used to exploit this, with radio detection vans patrolling the streets for unauthorized receivers, to fine people for watching TV without a lice…
> Any receiver using the heterodyne principle (this includes most current digital radio modems) is trivially detected by its local oscillator, often to some considerable range (potentially hundreds of metres). I'm sorry. This is not intrinsic; this is a design choice. Yes, most LOs just care about getting under legal emission masks, but there's nothing to prevent one from bringing it much lower. Further , as I explai…
Re: Internet disrupted in Pakistan amid arrest of former PM Imran Khan
#110I would like to believe there is a future where blocking access to the internet is unilaterally impossible. Major powers being able to pull the rug on what has become a foundation of modern society like this is too scary of a thing to allow. What could the answer be? Satellite-powered relays and DIY-able user devices to talk to them?
You'd need more than an internet that could not be shut off. You'd also need an internet where communication could not be tracked. One of the most effective ways to maintain an authoritarian regime is to proactively prevent a critical mass of revolt from forming. You just need to keep a steady low volume of arrests and disappearances going for people who express discontent. If not enough people are actively expressin…
Everyone knows what is going on and keeps the status quo, but a shock (often external) occurs to ignite the dry wood, and disruption erupts.
Demonstrations and riots can be healthy releases of tension in democracies. Bottle-in the regular microquakes, and you get devastating earthquakes instead.