Live data from Hacker News

A mansion hidden directly under the Bay Bridge

sfgate.com

101–110 of 157 posts

Re: A mansion hidden directly under the Bay Bridge

#101
>> In 1998, the feud between the Navy, which still owned Yerba Buena Island, and Brown went public. Navy officials expressed frustration that the new eastern span would flow directly over Nimitz House and the nearby historic residences of other officers. A Navy aide called the plan “devastating.”

Not In My Immediate Territorial Zone

Re: A mansion hidden directly under the Bay Bridge

#102
post #65
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just search for 4. You're almost never going to get in trouble for sleeping 2 adults and 3 kids in a hotel room for 4.

Often you can find that they will charge $xx per additional person, if you go over the listed figure (if you choose to declare the overage).

More often they will declare >N persons a 'fire safety hazard' and refuse for your safety and security. And to help them make more revenue.

Re: A mansion hidden directly under the Bay Bridge

#103

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well you have a very particular scenario, but in most cases, having to clean up everything, take the trash out, doing dishes, cleaning grill, taking linens out, collecting towels and starting the washer while still getting kicked out at 10? And paying hundreds for cleaning on top of that? You can’t enjoy the last day and you’re paying for it.

Been there, not even sure how it's legal to charge a (usually quite substantial) cleaning fee while having the guest do 1/2 the work.

In a Napoleonic legal system it might not be. Perhaps the question you should ask instead is why is it not illegal?

Re: A mansion hidden directly under the Bay Bridge

#104
post #79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've never had to do any of that. AirBNB is way cheaper for my family of 6 (3 adults, 3 kids)

you’ve been very lucky. the list of “chores” i’ve had to do at the airbnbs i’ve stayed at is unreal. even worse when i was paying absolutely ridiculous cleaning fees.

If there's a high cleaning fee I just don't do the "chores"

Re: A mansion hidden directly under the Bay Bridge

#106
post #94
post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

From personal experience, just stick the youngest on the floor

That’s outrageous. You could trip over one and sprain your ankle. We just tied ours outside and told people the kids identified as dogs.

What? Why?

Re: A mansion hidden directly under the Bay Bridge

#107
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"A frequently cited rule-of-thumb in transportation engineering is that tunnel construction costs two to three times as much as bridges, and that simple rule of thumb explains why there are so many more bridges than tunnels in operation today." What gives you your understanding? Mine is from multiple sources at the top of Google for the query "price of tunnel versus price of bridge"

I’ve never said it was the same. Somewhat comparable. In practice bridge is likely more expensive, if you take in the externalities accumulated over the lifespan of the bridge full of cars. Engineering costs its a matter of volume, what kind of ground you need to dig, expertise and experience. If you can get something like the Boring company up, costs would drop down. And engineering costs don’t account for externali…

The bridge is literally on top of a bunch of faults. Tunnels are even more of a death trap. No thanks.

Re: A mansion hidden directly under the Bay Bridge

#108

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sometimes, letting professionals help is the only way. They already know the places that can accommodate your party's size, and can often get very competitive rates.

Hiring this type of professional does not come at a "competitive rate"

Travel Agents tend to be free (for the traveler), what are you talking about?

Re: A mansion hidden directly under the Bay Bridge

#110
post #94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That’s outrageous. You could trip over one and sprain your ankle. We just tied ours outside and told people the kids identified as dogs.

What? Why?

The author probably intended it to be an hilarious joke, but they assumed you are as well versed in Fox News identity politics as they, sadly, are
Post reply on HN