Live data from Hacker News

Bullet Train – Rails-based SaaS framework

bullettrain.co

101–110 of 148 posts

Re: Bullet Train – Rails-based SaaS framework

#101

This might be a good place for a Java programmer to say thank you to the Rails community for your relentless mocking of Spring and Enterprise Java back in the days. Java is wonderful these days, and seriously I think you guys are a one of the major reasons why Java is so great today.

You’re welcome. Hehehe

Haha this comment immediately made me think of you, and here you are.

Re: Bullet Train – Rails-based SaaS framework

#103
post #100
post #96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nice list. Did you actually look at those sites? Your first example implies "The New York Times" uses Tailwind. Besides that being hilarious, you click the link and immediately see there is a big subheading "Events" I have never heard of NYT "Events", so I checked out their page: https://www.nytimes.com/events > Do you believe that [The New York Times Events doesn't] have teams with "design chops"? Yes, yes I do. Not…

> They don't use it to build applications because you make your own design system for applications. Some examples of SaaS companies that use Tailwind on the application side are PlanetScale, Fly.io, Lemon Squeezy, and Supabase.

I agree. The main uses of Tailwind are people making template-based pages, or putting up informational offerings in front of service-oriented businesses which give people APIs to build their own apps on.

Re: Bullet Train – Rails-based SaaS framework

#105

Building from scratch wastes a ton of time and I'm a big fan of starting with some working parts and customizing from there. I think with what's going on with AI it makes sense to use python more because all the researchers love python and make examples available through python notebooks. Then your tech stack is less split amongst many languages and there is less complexity and you can hire developers for cheaper. Ru…

This is what I've been wondering as well -- For a brand new project, why would anyone even consider using Rails if there's just a slight chance of adding ML/AI capability in the future?

Re: Bullet Train – Rails-based SaaS framework

#107
post #13
post #6

It'd be nice if there was a way to try the demo without signing in. That said, this looks like a good product. Are there other similar/competing things for Rails, and are there other competing SaaS-in-a-box things for other frameworks?

https://jumpstartrails.com is terrific.

Yup, jumpstart Pro is amazing...

Re: Bullet Train – Rails-based SaaS framework

#108
post #9

I evaluated Bullet Train last year when building an MVP for a client. Ended up using Jump Start Rails instead. Main reasons: 1. The hybrid approach to iOS and Android apps with JSR were better than what BT had to offer 2. There was a lot less to learn about the mental model of how JSR was built via Bullet Train. It was basically pay, pull down, configure, and get going with JSR. BT has things like SuperScaffolding, a…

At the time, JSP was more cost-effective than Bullet Train, and the early adoption of Tailwind was also significant.

Re: Bullet Train – Rails-based SaaS framework

#109
post #64
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’ve only heard good things about tailwind. Did you have a bad experience with it?

That's the nature of how these things go. People that like Tailwind praise it. People that think it's fundamentally bad design avoid it and don't say too much, or are drowned out by the people praising it. People who just write SCSS don't even think about it.

>> "fundamentally bad design"

They literally wrote the book on good design[1]

[1] https://www.refactoringui.com/

Re: Bullet Train – Rails-based SaaS framework

#110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And honestly, with jRuby there’s no reason you can’t just jump in this pool.

I like the Java and Kotlin languages and that I can get world class IDE support for them.

RubyMine does some really great stuff to provide a great IDE for Ruby.
Post reply on HN