Earlier quoted context omitted.
I started watching [3]. I have no stakes in this, but a lot of stuff I should be enraged about... I'm just not? Doesn't look fundamentally different to Debian or Firefox trademark policies. I guess it is an abrupt change in trademark enforcement for Rust.
Don't look fundamentally different? May I'm missing something but I have not seen a single tutorial or article about something Debian or Firefox that starts that with the disclaimer "This is not affiliated with the official Debian etc" Like the R** Foundation is asking to. Let's not even mention the unreasonables of not being able to name package writen in R** as package-rust.=, somethng that no other programing lang…
IANAL and this is not legal advise, but I wouldn't sweat about it. This same thing applies to any other trademark too, be it Debian, Firefox, Nintendo or Coca-Cola.