Live data from Hacker News

GPT-4 is phenomenal at Code

github.com

101–110 of 221 posts

Re: GPT-4 is phenomenal at Code

#101

Earlier quoted context omitted.

that's exactly what we're building with Control! https://twitter.com/sualehasif996/status/1635757961984221185

Any chance me, a lowly OSS Developer and Twitch Streamer of the Small Variety, could acquire access early? I would love to try using it for things like writing Mods for Games and such.

Feel free to email us, and we can make something work!

Re: GPT-4 is phenomenal at Code

#102
OP here. We're hiring! We're an early-stage startup, with funding from OpenAI, building the next-generation AI code editor. If you're the best hacker or designer ever, reach out to me at sualeh@anysphere.co. The problems we work on are really fun (extremely fast context retrieval from across big codebases, connecting language servers to language models, instruction-tuned embedddings) and we think the potential of what we're building is enormous (make all software engineers literally 10x more productive).

Re: GPT-4 is phenomenal at Code

#103
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I remember it being vastly overhyped about how artists were now obsolete, but it really hasn't happened. People have quickly became very attuned to the "AI art style"--humans are excellent at pattern recognition, after all--and if anything, it's made people appreciate how important an artists' individual style and attention to detail is.

People don’t make art for money (mostly) People do write code for money (mostly) See the difference? How would you feel if developers earned as much as artists do?

I don't really know what you're getting at. My point is that DALL-E/Stable Diffusion hasn't cut into the market for actual paid artists. Like, at all. Unlike what the doomsayers predicted. Software developers should feel equally as threatened, which is to say, not at all.

Re: GPT-4 is phenomenal at Code

#104
post #66
post #14

Remember the comments about artists and creatives when DALL-E came out? I remember.

I remember it being vastly overhyped about how artists were now obsolete, but it really hasn't happened. People have quickly became very attuned to the "AI art style"--humans are excellent at pattern recognition, after all--and if anything, it's made people appreciate how important an artists' individual style and attention to detail is.

It's much too soon to say, no? AI art is going to keep getting better quickly, and DALLE-2 only came out six months ago.

Re: GPT-4 is phenomenal at Code

#105

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think we'll all get more productive is all. There's a lot of projects that just weren't economical but now may become so. The bigger disruption will occur when Google, Facebook, Twitter, Reddit etc become useless from all the AI spam that's sure to overwhelm it all.

But here's the question. If these tools make existing devs 10x more productive, why bother hiring new people in the field?

This will create more demand for our field, not less. Increasing the power of programmers unlocks so much more potential.

Re: GPT-4 is phenomenal at Code

#107

I'm waiting for copilot that has access to something like language server and instead of just suggesting immediate completions and using open tabs for context it can use LS to pull references for context, suggest file creation, adding code in non trivial places. Then add a chat interface on top. Suddenly I'm really 10x - I would pay hundreds of dollars per month for this if it worked well - it would let me handle at…

>it would let me handle at least two or three IC jobs At that point you'll need to have at least two or three IC jobs just to survive, because wages will plummet.

I think experience is going to become a multiplier of value here, there will be a first adopter advantage and lower cost is going to create demand.

Re: GPT-4 is phenomenal at Code

#109

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think we'll all get more productive is all. There's a lot of projects that just weren't economical but now may become so. The bigger disruption will occur when Google, Facebook, Twitter, Reddit etc become useless from all the AI spam that's sure to overwhelm it all.

But here's the question. If these tools make existing devs 10x more productive, why bother hiring new people in the field?

Why hire new people, because companies want to do things they couldn't do before. This has been happening for decades already as tooling has evolved. It used to be very hard for average companies to write cross-platform commerce software, now it's a standard thing in the form of a website + payment processor.

There might be some companies or departments that don't need to evolve anymore, and they cut people. That happens already; the product gets finished, so they lay people off. But those people find new jobs.

Re: GPT-4 is phenomenal at Code

#110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm fine with programmers being a less needed skillset, but most artists were not making any money. The vast vast majority were the proverbial starving artists getting pennies for commissions, fighting for some form of respect for generations. Completely segregated from the idea of a market based economy, completely unwilling to do anything that people actually value, completely unwilling to move away from "disciplin…

How do you feel about NFTs

if referring to the collections

the collectibles market always was able to benefit from transparent supplies, transparent volume. NFT's added that and people acted surprised that the collectibles market was that big, when in reality nobody knows how many baseball cards (for example) were issued, how many rare ones are really out there and more. the analog collectibles market has wash trading too.

if NFT purchasers can remove the parasocial relationships they rely on with the creators and just build their own communities for resales then it'll be fine.

Post reply on HN