[deleted]
Gitlab loses one-third of its value after company issues weak forecast
101–110 of 220 posts
Re: Gitlab loses one-third of its value after company issues weak forecast
#102Gitlab pricing used to be something like $4/mo and they saw incredible growth. They raised their rates to $19/mo and now are seeing slow growth. In April they are raising to $29/mo- not sure what they think is going to happen. Also, for anyone that actively watches, they have to wonder if there will be another price hike once you are on their platform. Github Enterprise is only $21/mo and for most users it has all th…
At $29 * 7 * 12 per year it became way cheaper for us to just piece together functionality we needed from nginx+cgit+homegrown database to store users/repos/acl/push info and a few git hooks written in a few lines of PHP. The cost is now independent of the number of developers using the system. So far it did cost ~1 month of paying for github in dev time and I can't imagine it costing much more when we'll want to add…
2.5k doesn't pay 1 day of a developer in a top-of-market startup.
Re: Gitlab loses one-third of its value after company issues weak forecast
#103[dead]
Re: Gitlab loses one-third of its value after company issues weak forecast
#104[deleted]
Re: Gitlab loses one-third of its value after company issues weak forecast
#105Gitlab pricing used to be something like $4/mo and they saw incredible growth. They raised their rates to $19/mo and now are seeing slow growth. In April they are raising to $29/mo- not sure what they think is going to happen. Also, for anyone that actively watches, they have to wonder if there will be another price hike once you are on their platform. Github Enterprise is only $21/mo and for most users it has all th…
At $29 * 7 * 12 per year it became way cheaper for us to just piece together functionality we needed from nginx+cgit+homegrown database to store users/repos/acl/push info and a few git hooks written in a few lines of PHP. The cost is now independent of the number of developers using the system. So far it did cost ~1 month of paying for github in dev time and I can't imagine it costing much more when we'll want to add…
A developer costs about 250K a year all up. That doesn’t include opportunity cost.
49, 40 hour weeks a year = $127.55 an hour.
29* 7 * 12 / (127.55) = 19.09 hours
If it takes you more than 2.3 dev days (100% productive) you’re negative ROI doing it yourself.
This math doesn’t even factor in the opportunity cost of doing this.
Re: Gitlab loses one-third of its value after company issues weak forecast
#106Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've had a good experience using GitLab for source code repositories, pipelines, and code reviews. I don't have much experience using it for issue tracking and document management since we use Jira & Confluence for that. For my own hobby projects outside of work the free tier has been great, and it was easy to host my own gitlab runner so that I don't have to pay for CI/CD minutes.
Same here I only had good experience with it and I just can't get used to other PR review UIs. That being said if I were a CTO I would not buy their services, I think they are too expensive.
PR review UI seems very bad to me compared to both github and bit bucket. So it's probably a matter of what you got used to first.
One of its major issues is not displaying merge conflicts in some scenarios, just tells you of the existence of a conflict and you need to figure it out outside the UI.
Re: Gitlab loses one-third of its value after company issues weak forecast
#107nginx-proxy-manager + gitea + drone CI + terraform
Re: Gitlab loses one-third of its value after company issues weak forecast
#108things like github and gitlab always struck me as oddities. it costs virtually nothing to deploy a containerized gitea and jenkins, or gitlab CE, and you have direct control over its performance and options without any spend. call me old fashioned but these online git-o-matic sites just seem more like rent-seeking during a recession.
[deleted]
Re: Gitlab loses one-third of its value after company issues weak forecast
#109Earlier quoted context omitted.
At $29 * 7 * 12 per year it became way cheaper for us to just piece together functionality we needed from nginx+cgit+homegrown database to store users/repos/acl/push info and a few git hooks written in a few lines of PHP. The cost is now independent of the number of developers using the system. So far it did cost ~1 month of paying for github in dev time and I can't imagine it costing much more when we'll want to add…
A developer costs about 250K a year all up. That doesn’t include opportunity cost. 49, 40 hour weeks a year = $127.55 an hour. 29* 7 * 12 / (127.55) = 19.09 hours If it takes you more than 2.3 dev days (100% productive) you’re negative ROI doing it yourself. This math doesn’t even factor in the opportunity cost of doing this.
Their solution is not a monthly recurring event.
Re: Gitlab loses one-third of its value after company issues weak forecast
#110Earlier quoted context omitted.
At $29 * 7 * 12 per year it became way cheaper for us to just piece together functionality we needed from nginx+cgit+homegrown database to store users/repos/acl/push info and a few git hooks written in a few lines of PHP. The cost is now independent of the number of developers using the system. So far it did cost ~1 month of paying for github in dev time and I can't imagine it costing much more when we'll want to add…
2.5k doesn't pay 1 day of a developer in a top-of-market startup.
I need to up my rate :D