Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

America Has Replaced Capitalism with Cronyism

nymag.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

101–106 of 106 posts

Re: America Has Replaced Capitalism with Cronyism

#101

Post by wahnfrieden »

EarlKing wrote: post #100
wahnfrieden wrote: post #94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'll have to remember this trick - when I don't understand the meaning of something, just say that the meaning is wrong and that they're being condescending I'll also have to remember that Capitalism is all about owning physical tools, not anything about making money from people doing work for you. So if I contract freelance kitchen staff to make and sell food for me, when they show up with their own knives, they are…

We were discussing a self-employed man, not someone who has employees. You're moving the goalposts again. I have to ask: Do you actually own a business? Have you ever worked for yourself? This sort of condescension isn't the sort of thing common among working men, but is very common among the petit bourgeoisie who think they know better than everyone else. I'm just curious.

They asked about how their behavior is representative of capitalism, and learned it’s not. Your narrow description of capitalism would satisfy someone as radically anti capitalist as Bakunin

Yes and yes, I’m a laborer and I wouldn’t take profits off someone else’s work unless we are all sharing the returns aka anarcho syndicalism. I can but won’t subject workers to the exploitation and role based hierarchies I myself escaped. It’s not necessary.

Re: America Has Replaced Capitalism with Cronyism

#102

Post by zamnos »

EarlKing wrote: post #99
jaggederest wrote: post #95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not so hard to do, being a working man myself. Are you not a working man? My lived experience is that I have more in common with people flipping burgers than flying in private jets, but maybe you disagree.

I am, and I do, and yet that still doesn't change that a man who works for himself is still a capital-owner, whatever class he may identify with. I'm all for independent business owners (including small family businesses) identifying with the proletariat rather than the bourgeoisie, but pretending they're not bourgeoisie and sneering at people who disagree isn't going to incline anyone to listen to you.

Agreed that sneering isn't productive.

I don't know that I'd put a guy who owns a truck, a leaf blower, a lawn mower, a collection of garden sheers/related tools, and has a client base; I wouldn't put him in the same category as a bank CEO who makes was $5 million a year. Maybe I should though because the guy with the truck's been sold this load about freedom and entrepreneurial spirit that a FANG engineer making $300k/yr didn't buy. Personally, the guy with a yacht, a jet, a summer and winter home, who has enough money to never work another day in his life if he doesn't want to; that guy is definitely burgeoise. The guy that's gonna go hungry and have trouble making rent if he's not outside in the heat of the summer midday sun to landscape most days, just because he owns the truck he drives? Feels like I have a lot more in common with him, which makes it hard to want to throw him against the wall when the revolution comes. Maybe joining the burgeoise should have a $1 million initiation fee, but includes a free subscription to Netjets.

Re: America Has Replaced Capitalism with Cronyism

#103

Post by kevviiinn »

throwawaylinux wrote: post #91
kevviiinn wrote: post #89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What makes you think that capitalism inspired reforms are responsible when the most capitalistic country has the most homeless people? Do you have any sources for that information?

Is your claim that USA is the most capitalistic country? Can you define what that means, and do you have any sources proving it?

I'll take that as a "no"

Re: America Has Replaced Capitalism with Cronyism

#104

Post by throwawaylinux »

kevviiinn wrote: post #103
throwawaylinux wrote: post #91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is your claim that USA is the most capitalistic country? Can you define what that means, and do you have any sources proving it?

I'll take that as a "no"

Didn't think you'd have a source.

Re: America Has Replaced Capitalism with Cronyism

#105

Post by jaggederest »

EarlKing wrote: post #99
jaggederest wrote: post #95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not so hard to do, being a working man myself. Are you not a working man? My lived experience is that I have more in common with people flipping burgers than flying in private jets, but maybe you disagree.

I am, and I do, and yet that still doesn't change that a man who works for himself is still a capital-owner, whatever class he may identify with. I'm all for independent business owners (including small family businesses) identifying with the proletariat rather than the bourgeoisie, but pretending they're not bourgeoisie and sneering at people who disagree isn't going to incline anyone to listen to you.

I genuinely do not think that they are what Marx was describing as bourgeoisie.

Quoth wikipedia:

> In the 19th century, Marx distinguished two types of bourgeois capitalist: (i) the functional capitalists, who are business administrators of the means of production; and (ii) rentier capitalists whose livelihoods derive either from the rent of property or from the interest-income produced by finance capital, or both.

That is, managerial staff (low level managers better, these days, better fit the description of petit bourgeoisie, I think), and owners. Talking about a man who owns his own tools, employs himself but no others, you duck either category - perhaps you're thinking of someone who employs others and manages them, in which case, I agree, they've moved into the position of earning part of their income from management.

But merely having the tools you need is not "the means of production" classically - that would be real estate and finance more than directly tools. You begin to cross that threshold when my hypothetical car repair or building maintenance guy also owns his shop (or building) and the land it's on - but even so, I think the distinguishing characteristic is not merely ownership of land and finances, but subsisting primarily on the rents and/or administration thereof. If my hypothetical car repair guy had retired, rented his shop out, and leased tools to people he employed, yes, obviously.

But I think you'll find that many of the people who identify as business owners are, in this analysis, tradesmen and working men first and foremost, rather than earning their income primarily as administrators, rentiers, landlords, bankers, or lenders. That is why I distinguish between the two, and you may disagree, but it's certainly not moving the goalposts or sneering.

Re: America Has Replaced Capitalism with Cronyism

#106

Post by dingusdew »

drak0n1c wrote: post #45
dingusdew wrote: post #8

"Cronyism" is the long-term result of capitalism. It will always result in this type of corruption, it's the nature of an economic system that rewards greed. Cronyism is just another way to say "Late Stage Capitalism."

Interesting, does that mean modern Russia, China, and North Korea can be simply considered the results of Late Stage Socialism?

[dead]
Post reply on HN