The SEC's complaint. It's a brutal read if you're Sam: https://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2022/comp-pr2022-2...
I read the whole thing, it's a damning account and he's never going to work in finance again.
SEC Charges Samuel Bankman-Fried with Defrauding Investors in FTX [pdf]
101–110 of 251 posts
Re: SEC Charges Samuel Bankman-Fried with Defrauding Investors in FTX [pdf]
#102The most interest aspect in the FTX saga, for me, is that SBF was treated very gently by major news outlets (and maybe by government regulators too)... until regular individuals in social media started asking: Why is SBF being treated so kindly? Why would journalists (and regulators) assume that SBF meant well? A possible answer that no one ever mentions is that SBF possesses many qualities that are valued and admire…
Re: SEC Charges Samuel Bankman-Fried with Defrauding Investors in FTX [pdf]
#103Earlier quoted context omitted.
The various players in crypto space have written a ton of EULA mumbo-jumbo explaining that the coins are not securities (as they want the freedom to pump&dump/front run orders/etc). If they admitted the cryptos are securities, all sorts of pesky regulations would apply
Stealing securities you're supposed to store for me is a crime. Stealing non-securities you're supposed to store for me is also a crime.
Re: SEC Charges Samuel Bankman-Fried with Defrauding Investors in FTX [pdf]
#104Earlier quoted context omitted.
It won’t, just like even in this thread you see the perennial “this is good, actually.” At rock bottom the crypto world is held up by unadulterated greed and it shows on both ends: I am willing to make too-good-to-be-true “investments” because greed; when that unfolds the obvious way it was going to then it’s someone else’s fault and they’re not moving fast enough — also greed. In short: “Why aren’t I rich yet, I’ll…
> It won’t, just like even in this thread you see the perennial “this is good, actually.” That's not quite what the grandparent poster was talking about. One strain of thought on FTX/SBF has been conspiratorial. Allegedly, SBF was "a big Democratic donor" with connections in high places, so he would evade any serious US-based law enforcement action. This view is likely related to FTX's (previous) attempts to present…
Re: SEC Charges Samuel Bankman-Fried with Defrauding Investors in FTX [pdf]
#105Re: SEC Charges Samuel Bankman-Fried with Defrauding Investors in FTX [pdf]
#106The SEC's complaint. It's a brutal read if you're Sam: https://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2022/comp-pr2022-2...
I assume they have the evidence, and while what SBF was saying (we never touched customer funds etc.) was never particularly credible - it blows up the narative that he has maintained to date. Indeed much of the case is built on his public statements (and testimony) being false.
Re: SEC Charges Samuel Bankman-Fried with Defrauding Investors in FTX [pdf]
#107The most interest aspect in the FTX saga, for me, is that SBF was treated very gently by major news outlets (and maybe by government regulators too)... until regular individuals in social media started asking: Why is SBF being treated so kindly? Why would journalists (and regulators) assume that SBF meant well? A possible answer that no one ever mentions is that SBF possesses many qualities that are valued and admire…
I went through a few examples people brought up of journalists supposedly treating Bankman-Fried kindly the other day[1]. When I read what journalists were actually saying, they were quite negative about Bankman-Fried (saying he was "betraying his clients" or saying FTX "didn’t crumble due to bad luck, but what now appears to be unsustainable layers of deception").
The crypto community seems to be trying really hard to deflect from the fallout of yet another major crypto scam, and spinning whatever they can to make this seem like this is the fault of establishment non-crypto folks. Remember that just a few days ago people were claiming that Bankman-Fried hadn't been charged because he had paid off U.S. politicians.
Re: SEC Charges Samuel Bankman-Fried with Defrauding Investors in FTX [pdf]
#108The SEC's complaint. It's a brutal read if you're Sam: https://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2022/comp-pr2022-2...
I read the whole thing, it's a damning account and he's never going to work in finance again.
Re: SEC Charges Samuel Bankman-Fried with Defrauding Investors in FTX [pdf]
#109Earlier quoted context omitted.
> It won’t, just like even in this thread you see the perennial “this is good, actually.” That's not quite what the grandparent poster was talking about. One strain of thought on FTX/SBF has been conspiratorial. Allegedly, SBF was "a big Democratic donor" with connections in high places, so he would evade any serious US-based law enforcement action. This view is likely related to FTX's (previous) attempts to present…
Right, I'm aware of this. My claim (feel free to disagree) is that this conspiratorial thinking is coming from the exact same region of CryptoBrain as what built up crypto-land and FTX/SBF to begin with. It is the sensation that you are in on something special, everyone who is not in on it is either an antagonist or an idiot, and you deserve more than they deserve.
I think a lot of people are in the second camp, but dress it up as the first. It's funny how tons of people who claim "I'm here for the tech, hodl" get mad whenever somebody shorts their coin or the price goes down