Earlier quoted context omitted.
These were the top tokens they held in order of how they marked them on their balance sheet: FTT $5.9B SRM $5.4B SOL $2.2B MAPS $865M Found here: https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/596a07c029687f... >May I point you to a chart showing the price of Solana (SBF's preferred token)? Down 80% in four months is a pretty sudden drop in value. FTT, SRM, and MAPS are the garbage tokens they claimed were worth more…
>That's when they minted more FTT. Can you explain how exactly they did this? I want to understand, on a technical level, how they "minted" more of these tokens.
Here's the code for the FTT Deployer contract:
https://etherscan.io/address/0x50d1c9771902476076ecfc8b2a83a...
I'm not familiar enough with the Ethereum's Solidity programming language to give you an explanation.
It looks like it's an OpenZeppelin template. I've seen these re-used elsewhere. You can look through their docs to understand it better.