Live data from Hacker News

Star Trek (1964) [pdf]

leethomson.myzen.co.uk

101–110 of 132 posts

Re: Star Trek (1964) [pdf]

#101
post #87
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s down to JJ Abrams style of writing. He’s frequently talked about his love for a “mystery box” where he believes a good mystery is better than fact. The problem with his writing is, unlike most other writers who use mystery boxes, Abrams doesn’t even know himself what is inside that box. And you see this across all of his work. Frankly, I find him to be the most overrated writer and director in Hollywood because…

loved Super 8. Have watched it several times. It's his best movie IMO.

Super 8 was co-produced by Steven Spielberg, which is probably why the mystery part of Super 8 is cohesive and interesting.

Re: Star Trek (1964) [pdf]

#103
post #61
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sounds like they were Lost . ("Lost" was an extremely promising SF show that claimed to have a plan, but was revealed not to. Which is unforgivable when the attraction of the show was figuring out the mystery. My own theory is that the wildly successful first season led to the writers purchasing too much celebratory cocaine, and subsequently just phoning it in, while the business people were happy to milk it like a s…

It’s down to JJ Abrams style of writing. He’s frequently talked about his love for a “mystery box” where he believes a good mystery is better than fact. The problem with his writing is, unlike most other writers who use mystery boxes, Abrams doesn’t even know himself what is inside that box. And you see this across all of his work. Frankly, I find him to be the most overrated writer and director in Hollywood because…

Well in star wars case, the executives are to take the blame.

They planned a trilogy without writing it? They just shot ⅓ of a trilogy with no plan whatsoever of what should happen next?

Re: Star Trek (1964) [pdf]

#104
post #7

Even if you are not a fan, the PDF is a very enlightening read! "...blonde with a shape even a uniform could not hide" It's shockingly misogynistic!

Remember who the audience of the document is: powerful studio executives steeped heavily in the sexism that was the social norm for the era. They may not understand the philosophy of the series (and probably wouldn't have cared for it if they had) but they do understand that having pretty faces can improve viewer counts (not so different from today really) and they want to be certain that there's going to be ROI befo…

In fact, many of the plots were used as a way to “sneak” progressive ideas past the network execs. Gene would have had to make them think he was a certain kind of person pushing a certain kind of narrative instead of who he was, pushing those progressive ideas.

Re: Star Trek (1964) [pdf]

#105
post #90

Does that robot planet episode exist? It clearly exists in Futurama, just wondering wether that was inspired by Star Trek, or rather by that Star Trek pitch document?

It travels around in a cube instead :)

Re: Star Trek (1964) [pdf]

#106
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s down to JJ Abrams style of writing. He’s frequently talked about his love for a “mystery box” where he believes a good mystery is better than fact. The problem with his writing is, unlike most other writers who use mystery boxes, Abrams doesn’t even know himself what is inside that box. And you see this across all of his work. Frankly, I find him to be the most overrated writer and director in Hollywood because…

Well in star wars case, the executives are to take the blame. They planned a trilogy without writing it? They just shot ⅓ of a trilogy with no plan whatsoever of what should happen next?

agile movie development

Re: Star Trek (1964) [pdf]

#107
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I watched Melrose Place.

I watched couple seasons of Santa Barbara.

Ha! My grandmother lived with us when I was young and my parents hired someone to look after her while they were at work. I'd get home from school and she'd be watching Santa Barbara. When the Princess Bride came out, I already knew who Robin Wright was.

Re: Star Trek (1964) [pdf]

#109

Ronald D Moores “series bible” for battlestar galactica is also quite a fun read for fans. A copy is available from the same site, so clearly this person enjoys their sci fi. http://leethomson.myzen.co.uk/Battlestar_Galactica/Battlesta...

No post body was provided.

Re: Star Trek (1964) [pdf]

#110
post #90

Does that robot planet episode exist? It clearly exists in Futurama, just wondering wether that was inspired by Star Trek, or rather by that Star Trek pitch document?

Parts of it sound like "What Are Little Girls Made Of"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/What_Are_Little_Girls_Made_Of%...

Post reply on HN