Earlier quoted context omitted.
To an extent, but we're 10x richer than we were in 1900; we do not eat 10x as many calories. And it's poor people who eat more calories now, not rich people.
> it's poor people who eat more calories now, not rich people That's my point; if you look at a map of obesity rates in the US overlaid with a map of poverty, there's a very strong correlation. The cheap access to calories today makes it easier to overconsume. In the past, the high cost of calories meant that only the wealthy could really ever become obese (outside of genetic factors).
But even if absolutely true, how do you solve for that? Laws limiting what you can purchase/eat would simply be a non-starter.