Live data from Hacker News

Flanderization

en.wikipedia.org

101–110 of 137 posts

Re: Flanderization

#101

This applies to more than just cartoons. Look at Seinfeld. First 3 seasons, the characters were real, each w/ their own personalties, quirks, etc. By the final season, each character became so extreme, so one-dimentional in it's characterization and personalities it was entirely unwatchable (at the time) for me.

Today's sitcoms just jump straight to it. The Neighborhood, for example.

Re: Flanderization

#102
There aren't enough examples for this to be considered a meaningful progression. Even the wikipedia page is struggling to prove its worth.

Re: Flanderization

#104
I never knew this had a word to it, but it is definitely a strange phenomena itself.

Especially with content creation. People become the X person. The writing person. The growth hacker person. The data science person.

It almost pigeonholes you into being a one-trick pony. Platforms like TikTok and LinkedIn especially push flanderization in this light and good luck getting out to diversify yourself without a new account.

The more obvious example is politics though. There are certain exaggerated traits you associate with the most popular candidates because of how often you are exposed to them.

Re: Flanderization

#105

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just spend a week on tvtropes.org and you'll instantly become a better writer I think. It's not to say that tropes are bad but it's important to use it as a repository of easily accessible writing mistakes so you can quickly learn from the past and contextualize them for your own synthesis.

I don't think tropes are mistakes. In fact, looking at tvtropes you see lots of examples from the most popular and successful movies, TV shows, books, etc. If you're a writer you should be trying to say something new, but you shouldn't try to make everything new. People would be confused and put off by something that was violating and subverting every trope in fiction, but they would be amused by something that subve…

There's a trope for that! https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Administrivia/TropesA...

Re: Flanderization

#106
post #72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just spend a week on tvtropes.org and you'll instantly become a better writer I think. It's not to say that tropes are bad but it's important to use it as a repository of easily accessible writing mistakes so you can quickly learn from the past and contextualize them for your own synthesis.

> Just spend a week on tvtropes.org and you'll instantly become a better writer I think. Maybe, but from my experience I find the more time I spend on browsing through tvtropes in a certain week, the more I overthink my writing and get absolutely fuck all done. Don't get me wrong, it's worthwhile to understand tropes, but its not going to make you a better writer instantly. And repeated exposure to an attention-sucki…

Don’t go there for the tropes; go there for the examples. Look up the things you’re thinking of doing, and then consume the media where people are saying that thing was done well. It’s like reading highly-cited journal papers, for fiction.

Re: Flanderization

#107
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As you age, the rewards you get from social conformity become less and less important because your social role starts to be squeezed in general. Pop culture stops catering to you as much, you are less likely to multiply intimate partners or discover new friends or change your circle to a great extent, though obviously this is a vague trend and there are tons of exceptions to this. From your own perspective, you have…

> you are less likely to have multiple intimate partners Fun fact: STDs are common in young adults and in 55+ communities - the reason behind this is left as an exercise for the reader. https://www.aarp.org/health/conditions-treatments/news-05-20...

simple 55+ no longer have children at home (if they ever had them), menopause has removed the fear of unexpected pregnancy, divorces have already happened if they were going to and death has started claiming partners from devoted couple meaning you have a large number of financially secure single people with time on their hands.

Re: Flanderization

#108
Part of why I could never really get around to starting a blog is because I have too many topics I’d want to talk about from so many different interests that there wouldn’t be much of an audience for it except for people who just want to know about my life, which is no one. You either flanderize or talk to the void.

Instead, I write comments everywhere across several different threads in many forums. I am an expert in many topics. I find it more satisfying, and I have small micro audiences within each thread.

Re: Flanderization

#109
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As you age, the rewards you get from social conformity become less and less important because your social role starts to be squeezed in general. Pop culture stops catering to you as much, you are less likely to multiply intimate partners or discover new friends or change your circle to a great extent, though obviously this is a vague trend and there are tons of exceptions to this. From your own perspective, you have…

> you are less likely to have multiple intimate partners Fun fact: STDs are common in young adults and in 55+ communities - the reason behind this is left as an exercise for the reader. https://www.aarp.org/health/conditions-treatments/news-05-20...

STDs are common in young adults and in 55+ communities - the reason behind this is left as an exercise for the reader.

According to my mother, is because nobody in her retirement village is afraid of getting pregnant anymore.

Re: Flanderization

#110
post #80

This is one of those moments that makes me fall in love with the internet all over again. I've thought about this idea (without knowing there was a term for it!) wrt aging in real life. So many people seem to become increasingly caricature as they get older. The guy who likes woodworking and European travel becomes the embodiment of woodworking and European travel. It's all he talks about. His kids roll their eyes at…

> I've thought about this idea (without knowing there was a term for it!) I used to call it the "Kramer Effect", much like you, without knowing it was called Flanderization and was using it in the early 2000s to describe my displeasure with the character Joey from Friends. Joey went from kind of low intellect to full retard by the end of the show and very inexplicably.

So why didn't you call it Joey Effect? Did Kramer also go through the exaggeration process throughout the series?
Post reply on HN