Earlier quoted context omitted.
> You seem to have read the details of the case, yet you say that Asian Americans are fighting for equality by citing a case that has determined at the lower level and appellate court that no systemic discrimination occurred. "Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College (Docket 20–1199) and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. University of North Carolina (Docket 21-707) are a pair…
> It is though. It is alleging racial discrimination. It is literally the first line on Wikipedia. It is an allegation that has been determined twice by courts not to hold water. People can allege anything, and they often do for political or pr reasons (politics being the real reason for this case, imho). > Not sure what is the cause for your defensiveness I have lived in Asian for 9 years of my profession life, and…
That describes vast majority of SCOTUS cases. Not surprising. That's kind of how cases reach SCOTUS (except in rare occasions when SCOTUS grants writs of certiorari to a district court case).