Live data from Hacker News

Kitsault, Canada’s $50M 1980s ghost town

justinmcelroy.com

101–110 of 197 posts

Re: Kitsault, Canada’s $50M 1980s ghost town

#101
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why the italics on 'closely'?

Everyone's related to everyone else if you go back far enough. Theodore and Franklin Roosevelt turned out to be sixth (-ish?) cousins.

Not just everyone... everything that ever lived has a common ancestor.

Re: Kitsault, Canada’s $50M 1980s ghost town

#103
post #81
post #67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Alaska Panhandle (the part of Alaska that extends down the west coast of BC) and the coast of BC are actually roughly equal length (BC's coast is slightly longer, I believe). You are probably looking at a Mercator projection which distorts sizes. Try looking at a more accurate map projection.

Its more that why does the panhandle exist at all, it should all be BC.

American politicians and capitalists realized how valuable the western half of the continent before British Canada did and they acted on it. If you look as the west coast it’s mostly American coast, it’s kind of surprising that Americans didn’t just take it all when you think about it

Re: Kitsault, Canada’s $50M 1980s ghost town

#104
post #81
post #67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Alaska Panhandle (the part of Alaska that extends down the west coast of BC) and the coast of BC are actually roughly equal length (BC's coast is slightly longer, I believe). You are probably looking at a Mercator projection which distorts sizes. Try looking at a more accurate map projection.

Its more that why does the panhandle exist at all, it should all be BC.

There's no road along the coast, just isolated port towns, and there's a massive barrier of mountains and glaciers between it and BC, so on a human scale it's essentially not related to mainland Canada.

Re: Kitsault, Canada’s $50M 1980s ghost town

#105
post #43

Looking at the map I only just noticed how small the BC coastline is and how Alaska takes most of it. Looks like it goes back to agreement between England and Russia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Saint_Petersburg_(18... And there were never more than 700 Russians in Alaska. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_America#Sale_of_Alaska...

The Alaskan panhandle was the subject of a border dispute between Canada and the United States. The UK adjudicated and it was decided in favour of the US. It was a very unpopular decision in Canada. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alaska_boundary_dispute

New Hampshire and Maine had a border dispute over Seavey’s Island, which was only settled in 2002: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piscataqua_River_border_disp...

Re: Kitsault, Canada’s $50M 1980s ghost town

#106

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Uhm, The infra looks super depressing... https://www.google.ca/maps/place/Kitsault,+BC+V0J+3T0,+Canad...

Yeah read the blog post, that's by design--the town was abandoned in the 80s and has been maintained by a private owner. I think it would be kind of cool to live there as an escape from the hustle and bustle of cities. Like living in a shack in the woods, except the shack has most of the amenities of modern life (circa 1980).

I agree!

I would totally move there assuming life support. Health, Food, Power, Heat, Water.

What do for work - and if trying to make a Hacker Commune, how structure (I actually lived on a commune and know how badly they are managed)

Re: Kitsault, Canada’s $50M 1980s ghost town

#107
post #81
post #67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Alaska Panhandle (the part of Alaska that extends down the west coast of BC) and the coast of BC are actually roughly equal length (BC's coast is slightly longer, I believe). You are probably looking at a Mercator projection which distorts sizes. Try looking at a more accurate map projection.

Its more that why does the panhandle exist at all, it should all be BC.

It exists cause Russia settled Alaska including a fort in the panhandle. There was treaty with British in 1825 that established the boundary of panhandle (but was very ambiguous for landward side). Russia then sold Alaska to the US in 1867. The landward boundary had to be decided in 1903.

Re: Kitsault, Canada’s $50M 1980s ghost town

#108
post #81
post #67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Alaska Panhandle (the part of Alaska that extends down the west coast of BC) and the coast of BC are actually roughly equal length (BC's coast is slightly longer, I believe). You are probably looking at a Mercator projection which distorts sizes. Try looking at a more accurate map projection.

Its more that why does the panhandle exist at all, it should all be BC.

Why should Alaska be a weird attached island like that? It should all be Canada

Re: Kitsault, Canada’s $50M 1980s ghost town

#109

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah read the blog post, that's by design--the town was abandoned in the 80s and has been maintained by a private owner. I think it would be kind of cool to live there as an escape from the hustle and bustle of cities. Like living in a shack in the woods, except the shack has most of the amenities of modern life (circa 1980).

I agree! I would totally move there assuming life support. Health, Food, Power, Heat, Water. What do for work - and if trying to make a Hacker Commune, how structure (I actually lived on a commune and know how badly they are managed)

StarLink. Remote work outpost. AirBnB it too maybe?

Re: Kitsault, Canada’s $50M 1980s ghost town

#110
post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The author even mentions driving in "Which means, for a fee, you can drive two hours down a barely passable road. The caretakers will open the locked gates"

Seems like a ferry would make sense to access it. BC already has a ton of those.

Ferry service is expensive infrastructure. Who would pay?
Post reply on HN