Earlier quoted context omitted.
> zero caching When each request is from a different person, you get essentially zero cache. Nope, server-side caching reduces back-end processing.
There are multiple strategies for caching in the server, without them IIRC the php code will be interpreted on each request, files parsed, and obviously hit the database for each request. There's fastcgi caching in nginx, php opcode in php-fpm, and WP specific cave plugins like Super Cache. At least this was the case ~10 years ago.
Hacker News “Who is Hiring?” top-level comments over time
101–110 of 126 posts
Re: Hacker News “Who is Hiring?” top-level comments over time
#102Meta-side question I've had since being part of this community for awhile, how come when a YC staked company posts they are hiring comments are disabled? As I post this "Generally Intelligent" (YC S17) is hiring for ML people (spot 15 per my last refresh.)
" If job ads were threads, each thread would be a generic referendum on the company. Worse, it would be the same referendum over and over.
Job ads are boring, so there wouldn't be anything to discuss other than how one feels about the company, and that's boring except to people who have strong feelings on the topic, and strong feelings on the internet tend to be negative, so the threads would fill up with negative generic comments.
I believe that the hivemind resents boring things, such as submissions where the only new information is "X is hiring", so it gets cranky and fills the vacuum with indignation, basically as the only way to amuse itself in the absence of anything interesting to discuss. It doesn't want to, it just doesn't know any better way to have fun in a vacuum. In practice, what this would look like in a job thread is "I applied in 2015 and never heard back", plus—if there has ever been a negative story X about the company—every variation of X, X, X, repeated increasingly snarkily.
Actually, it's worse. Building a business is a long hard slog. One needs to hire far more often than one has scintillating new information for the community to have fun discussing. Therefore, each successive job ad would be even more boring than the previous one, leading to monotonically increasing resentment. Repetition is the enemy of curiosity.
Launch posts don't suffer from this dynamic because by definition, the startup is new, so there's something new to discuss. "
HTH
Re: Hacker News “Who is Hiring?” top-level comments over time
#103Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's a static site, no reason for the server not to be able to handle thousands of connections at once with almost no configuration changes with some like Nginx or Apache. Or even a domain which points directly to a S3 bucket. Hope you're not looking at devop roles on who is hiring posts.
It's a WordPress blog
Re: Hacker News “Who is Hiring?” top-level comments over time
#104Earlier quoted context omitted.
Apache will spawn a process (at least with pfork) and the process will wait for a keep alive connection to send a new req. Everything old is new again. Gotta tune it out.
Is this true? So Apache basically launches a Slowloris attack on itself for every connection?
Re: Hacker News “Who is Hiring?” top-level comments over time
#105Earlier quoted context omitted.
Puzzling comment. Perhaps you should read the Terms of Service. User Content Transmitted Through the Site: With respect to the content or other materials you upload through the Site or share with other users or recipients (collectively, “User Content”), you represent and warrant that you own all right, title and interest in and to such User Content, including, without limitation, all copyrights and rights of publicit…
There are so many problems with that with regard to GDPR. It’s not even linked from the signup page, so I’ve never even been informed about it. I’ve never been given the option to consent or reject consent to anything. You also can’t just say it’s “irrevocable” and pretend like GDPR doesn’t apply.
Re: Hacker News “Who is Hiring?” top-level comments over time
#106I started and abandoned a little side project a while ago where I wanted to see which employers tended to have the exact same (or fuzzy-the-same) "Who's Hiring" post month after month. Goal would be to find some signal about which posts were actually resulting in hiring (in other words, the company didn't come back with the same posting) and which ones were just trawling for the same job month after month without act…
I’m sure there are other reasons companies would post each month: churn, or always on the lookout for strong talent, etc.
Re: Hacker News “Who is Hiring?” top-level comments over time
#107Earlier quoted context omitted.
Puzzling comment. Perhaps you should read the Terms of Service. User Content Transmitted Through the Site: With respect to the content or other materials you upload through the Site or share with other users or recipients (collectively, “User Content”), you represent and warrant that you own all right, title and interest in and to such User Content, including, without limitation, all copyrights and rights of publicit…
There are so many problems with that with regard to GDPR. It’s not even linked from the signup page, so I’ve never even been informed about it. I’ve never been given the option to consent or reject consent to anything. You also can’t just say it’s “irrevocable” and pretend like GDPR doesn’t apply.
yeah, you may wanna check your maps - youre a little too far from home.
Re: Hacker News “Who is Hiring?” top-level comments over time
#108Had a similar thought a few years ago and added a total posts chart to go along with the technology trends, https://www.hntrends.com/2022/may.html Looks like you have June 2021 as the all time high as well. Doesn't look like June 2022 is going to get even close, which makes sense based on current freezes/layoffs.
the real number you want to see is the one you cant get - number of applicants per job posting is surely going up
Re: Hacker News “Who is Hiring?” top-level comments over time
#109Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are so many problems with that with regard to GDPR. It’s not even linked from the signup page, so I’ve never even been informed about it. I’ve never been given the option to consent or reject consent to anything. You also can’t just say it’s “irrevocable” and pretend like GDPR doesn’t apply.
>GDPR yeah, you may wanna check your maps - youre a little too far from home.
Re: Hacker News “Who is Hiring?” top-level comments over time
#110Earlier quoted context omitted.
I hope the downvotes are for the sarcasm, not the point expressed. But considering other threads about this have been flagged[1] I guess this topic is taboo. 1: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20052076
I think many people have the opinion that GDPR 'should not' apply outside the European region (or other countries that have enacted GDPR legislation). A common sense approach would be to say that if someone in Europe chooses to submit their details to an entity based outside of Europe then that's just their choice to waive their rights to their data. Lawyers and legislators might make arguments and talk about analogo…