The big question with Tether has been, if they are holding commercial paper, whose commercial paper? Traders who deal in commercial paper of real companies that do real stuff don't see Tether present in that market. The dollar amounts are too big to hide. The suspicion is that their "commercial paper" is high-interest loans to other cryptocurrency companies. With the whole crypto sector in decline, those loans are at…
> This is how you get a 2008-type crash - loans which seem to be unrelated but are tied to a common market. How does this happen again 15 years later? Is it because we ineffectively dealt with 2008? A result of the repeal of Glass-Steagall? Or have we over regulated banking to the point the miscreants went underground to build things like crypto? I don't get it. Crashing over and over doesn't seem good for anyone.
Top stablecoins shed $7B in May as traders redeem tokens en masse
101–110 of 376 posts
Re: Top stablecoins shed $7B in May as traders redeem tokens en masse
#102Earlier quoted context omitted.
> USDC (coinbase) is properly and regularly audited I've only found attestations just like USDT, where did you see an audit?
I’m sure I’ve seen an audit before but because Coinbase is a public company all finances have to be released so you should be able to see it there too?
Re: Top stablecoins shed $7B in May as traders redeem tokens en masse
#103The big question with Tether has been, if they are holding commercial paper, whose commercial paper? Traders who deal in commercial paper of real companies that do real stuff don't see Tether present in that market. The dollar amounts are too big to hide. The suspicion is that their "commercial paper" is high-interest loans to other cryptocurrency companies. With the whole crypto sector in decline, those loans are at…
> This is how you get a 2008-type crash - loans which seem to be unrelated but are tied to a common market. How does this happen again 15 years later? Is it because we ineffectively dealt with 2008? A result of the repeal of Glass-Steagall? Or have we over regulated banking to the point the miscreants went underground to build things like crypto? I don't get it. Crashing over and over doesn't seem good for anyone.
Hence they are not regulated.
So even keeping GS (which was limited to big banks and a few similar institutions) wouldn't have made any difference. Not that keeping it would necessarily have been a bad ide...
Re: Top stablecoins shed $7B in May as traders redeem tokens en masse
#104The collateral for DAI are hihgly crypto correlated - 43.8% USDC, 32.1% ETH, 11.3% WBTC, 5.9% USDP, and others. ETH and WBTC are just Ethereum and BTC, both of which have dropped considerably recently. USDP somehow dropped to ~$0 since April. USDC is sworn to be 100% USD backed so let's take that at face value. DAI is said to have 150% over-collateralization. ETH & WBTC have dropped more than half. Let's say just off…
Re: Top stablecoins shed $7B in May as traders redeem tokens en masse
#105The big question with Tether has been, if they are holding commercial paper, whose commercial paper? Traders who deal in commercial paper of real companies that do real stuff don't see Tether present in that market. The dollar amounts are too big to hide. The suspicion is that their "commercial paper" is high-interest loans to other cryptocurrency companies. With the whole crypto sector in decline, those loans are at…
Re: Top stablecoins shed $7B in May as traders redeem tokens en masse
#106Earlier quoted context omitted.
Please check your local regulations on this. What Uwuemu says makes sense, but tax law does not have to make sense. I might be wrong, but I believe the IRS views every transaction as a taxable event. Crypto -> crypto included.
You are right. When you trade crypto->crypto, the IRS views it as if you traded crypto->USD then USD->crypto.
Re: Top stablecoins shed $7B in May as traders redeem tokens en masse
#107The moment I learned that people want to buy crypto as a means to get rich in (evil ;)) fiat money, I knew I had a ponzi scheme in front of me. The interesting idea behind crypto once was to have a totally different system. Yet in reality, with greedy apes on a spacerock, it was an unreachable Utopia
different systems historically come about by extreme violence, genocides and migrations of peoples, a little icky shills and ponzis is a very low price
Re: Top stablecoins shed $7B in May as traders redeem tokens en masse
#108Earlier quoted context omitted.
Does this really matter though? Is it any different to drug lord having a tonne of dirty cash they can’t use anywhere because all the useful places you could put it want nothing to do with you? Watching from the sidelines, the Crypto world seems to just be morphing into the normal financial world.
> Watching from the sidelines, the Crypto world seems to just be morphing into the normal financial world. Say this is true, how amazing would that be for countries without existing banking infrastructure to easily access it?
Re: Top stablecoins shed $7B in May as traders redeem tokens en masse
#109Earlier quoted context omitted.
the majority of crypto is being held in non custodial wallets, not exchanges. a better way to frame your comment: why does the world use Stripe and PayPal when you can just go to your bank and ask them to setup a multi day long wire process from bank A to B for less fees?
People do both, every day, what is your point?
Re: Top stablecoins shed $7B in May as traders redeem tokens en masse
#110Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The interesting idea behind crypto once was to have a totally different system. the problem with this idea is that this idea of a "different" system is just merely going to evolve back into what we have today. The fundamental needs of a financial system doesn't change much, and what we have today is fit for purpose (mostly - there's efficiency to be had and red tape to cut).
It is until you're on a list, for whatever reason. When states and countries can just block your access to your bank accounts, because you're on the other side of interests, it gets...Interesting With a decentralised approach, such actions would've needed to be implemented in the real world, not merely by the flick of a virtual lever.