Mental illness, attention deficit disorder, and suffering

Positive attitude is everything but no the reality is ADHD and ADD are not superpowers.

The "test" is an honest answer to the question "if they made a pill to make it go away, would you take it?"

> The clinical diagnosis for a mental illness is that it impacts your life in a negative way. His attention deficit does not impact his life in a negative way, therefore it’s not a disorder.

In my experience, I noticed most the negative impacts caused by the disorder were actually due to how I was treated by others for the negative impact my disorder caused in their lives (real or perceived).

A lot of people using "ADD," should know that it doesn't exist anymore. Now it's all diagnosed as ADHD with three sub types: combined (the most common), hyperactive, and inactive. "ADD" aligns with the inactive type. Anyway...

There's a perspective in some ADHD circles (and likely other mental health circles) that the concept of neurodiversity/neurodivergent are not the correct framing for living with ADHD. It follows this idea that when people highlight (or unmask) the parts of ADHD that make them quirky or entertaining to society, they are not revealing the _very negative_ symptoms of ADHD that are extremely debilitating. The proliferation of sound bite videos that portray ADHD in a very positive light on TikTok, ADHD memes, etc. gloss over the dark realities of ADHD. My personal belief is that while it's good to help people understand some of the more lighthearted ADHD symptoms, it's important that we share even the negative aspects. Of course, negative things don't get engagement (as the author states when he gets to mentioning a battle with depression).

TikTok isn't covering things like ADHDers' propensity to lose their jobs due to poor performance, the financial ruin from overspending and money mismanagement, poor physical health and wellbeing, likelihood to have comorbid depression and anxiety, missing out academic/professional opportunities, fewer if any meaningful relationships because of social disorder symptoms attributed to ADHD. You rarely, if ever, see social media ADHDers talk about how ADHD affects something like dental health because of the "out of sight, out of mind" effects and the inability to form healthy hygiene habits because there are no immediate consequences (the "now or not now" mental modes). How getting a restful night's sleep is a rare delight because of ADHD's ability to delay sleep. You'll never hear them talk about how ADHD people have a significantly shorter life expectancy than the general population--some studies calculating it by as much as 20 years.

These are all very negative, debilitating pieces of ADHD that get glossed over by modern social media movements of the quirky/neurodivergent ADHD crowd. Even this author doesn't really dive into the dirty pieces.

This is a long one, but all of that said: I have ADHD. I was diagnosed at 8 years old. Finally, got on stimulants for the first time as an adult and my life's trajectory turned around in a just few months. I still struggle with all the negative things that come with ADHD. But I believe that ADHD is both a blessing and a curse; that I can personally celebrate the parts that make me quirky and bring me joy and also be aware of the negative effects it has on me and on my ability to function in modern society. I do see it as a disability, but not as a hindrance. The more I learn to accommodate it for myself the better off I'm going to be long-term.

I'd really encourage you to read up on how stimulants affect people with ADHD. It is quite the opposite of "performance enhancing" that you're implying here.

You're right, defining a "disorder" is hardly a boolean question. ADHD has been studying extensively and there is substantial evidence for biological origins. For one, heritability very high, reported to be somewhere between 0.75 and .9, only slightly less than traits such as height.

Significant differences in brain neurophysiology are well-documented in ADHD (vs. non-ADHD people), and show genesis of the condition is multi-factorial. Calling ADHD a "disorder" implies the condition has physiological origins but is not attributable to a narrow/distinct range of factors like a condition termed a "disease" (such as viral illness, etc.).

The issue of diagnosis conceptually reflects a state where "malfunction" and "maladjustment" or "maladaptation" coincide. IOW malfunction is relevant when it's maladaptive, that is lacks fitness to a problem-space. In a computer application a bug (malfunction) can lurk undetected as long as the code containing the error is not invoked. But when some refactoring exposes the bad code to invocation, that code is maladaptive and the result is dysfunction of the application.

An example is an ADHD individual with trouble prioritizing who takes longer than peers to complete tasks. Not a problem when deadlines are minimal. But thrust into a role where timely performance is required risks failure, loss of a job, etc. The individual's malfunction is then maladaptive, which could prompt the person to seek help to mitigate malfunction and improve adaptability to realities of employment.

Consequently there's no across the board right or wrong answer to the "correct" way to regard ADHD characteristics. Also I agree with you that "mental illness" is a misleading term that could profitably be expunged from our vocabulary. However were that to happen the conditions that are labeled as such are still very real and will in many cases continue to need treatment regardless of the labels we apply.