Live data from Hacker News

Facebook paid Republican strategy firm to malign TikTok

washingtonpost.com

101–110 of 324 posts

Re: Facebook paid Republican strategy firm to malign TikTok

#101
>The White House is briefing TikTok stars about the war in Ukraine

>“We recognize this is a critically important avenue in the way the American public is finding out about the latest,” said the White House director of digital strategy, Rob Flaherty, “so we wanted to make sure you had the latest information from an authoritative source.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/11/tik-tok...

Re: Facebook paid Republican strategy firm to malign TikTok

#102
post #86

Completely unnecessary. TikTok maligns itself.

How convinced are you that your opinion is coming from actions of TikTok itself and not reports of alleged actions by TikTok? The American public (and by association, a large controlling part of the digital hivemind) is very easy to sway

> very easy to sway opinion of American public

Compared to what? Chinese public?

Re: Facebook paid Republican strategy firm to malign TikTok

#103
post #52

At what point does: - having Facebook/Meta experience on your resume starts hurting you against others who don't - selling your company to Facebook/Meta or product on it hurts your brand and perceived to be immoral Is Facebook/Meta the Tobacco company of our generation? The harmful effects of smoking were covered up for almost a century, much as the impact of mass remote dopamine manipulation is not as prolific.

When you see a Meta candidate you know * They went through one of the hardest interview loops in the industry * They went through one of the hardest promotion ladders in the industry * They solve all problems at huge scale out of the box * If you aren't paying top of market and they're still interested, they're most likely financially comfortable from their years at Meta and won't be jumping ship every 18 months for…

I think all of this assumes the candidate is for a highly technical position, which is not all Meta jobs.

Even then, why do we assume they were promoted, or solved "all problems", or have some altruistic reason to make less?

The only thing we know is that they were hired by Meta sometime in the past.

Re: Facebook paid Republican strategy firm to malign TikTok

#104

Here’s what’s sad about this; TikTok was a product clearly built for “younger” users (Gen Z, younger millennials) the same way Facebook was in the aughts for its youthful cohort (older millennials). Facebook then evolved their product and made massive inroads with older audiences, sending their value and userbase soaring… point. But in doing so Facebook left younger users underserved they chose TikTok. And now to pap…

Well that's not entirely true. Instagram (a Meta property) is more the competitor to TikTok. And this isn't crying to the government. This is trying to push the dangers of TikTok on right wing cultural outlets. The thing is, this is true, the incentives of TikTok are not pro-social. Then again, neither are those of Instagram (or Facebook for that matter).

Re: Facebook paid Republican strategy firm to malign TikTok

#105

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would be very hesitant to hire anyone with Google on their resume for the same reason. Maybe they're good, but maybe they're one of those engineers willing to trade in ethics for bucks. (I'm thinking specifically of those engineers that write the code used to terminate accounts without sufficient recourse).

> I'm thinking specifically of those engineers that write the code used to terminate accounts without sufficient recourse Do people typically put that specific information on their resume? Alphabet employs over a hundred thousand people, 99% of them won't have looked at that at all. I personally don't work at a FAANG but I'd take the chance if I got it - the bucks are so monstrous compared to my current compensation…

They might put that they worked on, say, Google Play, which would certainly raise concerns. I'd need to figure out what they worked on before making any sort of offer. If they didn't say what products they worked on, the resume would go right in the bin (of course).

Re: Facebook paid Republican strategy firm to malign TikTok

#106

Quoted post unavailable.

> Meta spokesperson Andy Stone defended the campaign by saying, “We believe all platforms, including TikTok, should face a level of scrutiny consistent with their growing success.”

Gross — the way they try to spin it.

Re: Facebook paid Republican strategy firm to malign TikTok

#107
It is not unlikely that if Trump had won a second term, then TikTok would have been banned in the US.

Facebook made a gamble though and as a downside they probably have less goodwill with the current administration compared to what they could have had.

Re: Facebook paid Republican strategy firm to malign TikTok

#108

Serious question, for those with more experience than me “in the game” running big successful companies: are dirty tactics like this (and worse) par for the course and generally expected, and it’s sort of understood that the outsiders/general public are shielded from it? Or is it actually shocking? It often seems like there’s two “worlds” operating at the same time. In one, there’s outrage and indignation at this sor…

Yes. In a competitive environment with no law/enforcement, anyone who doesn't cheat loses to someone who does. This is the state of nature, law of the jungle.

Re: Facebook paid Republican strategy firm to malign TikTok

#110

Here’s what’s sad about this; TikTok was a product clearly built for “younger” users (Gen Z, younger millennials) the same way Facebook was in the aughts for its youthful cohort (older millennials). Facebook then evolved their product and made massive inroads with older audiences, sending their value and userbase soaring… point. But in doing so Facebook left younger users underserved they chose TikTok. And now to pap…

Well that's not entirely true. Instagram (a Meta property) is more the competitor to TikTok. And this isn't crying to the government. This is trying to push the dangers of TikTok on right wing cultural outlets. The thing is, this is true, the incentives of TikTok are not pro-social. Then again, neither are those of Instagram (or Facebook for that matter).

Has FB met any kids? "Mom say TikTok will corrupt my morals" is recruiting campaign, not a destructive attack.
Post reply on HN