Yahoo employees: Get out now before the vultures descend
101–110 of 111 posts
Re: Yahoo employees: Get out now before the vultures descend
#102Re: Yahoo employees: Get out now before the vultures descend
#103Re: Yahoo employees: Get out now before the vultures descend
#104I don't understand why Yahoo still exists (or at least why it still gets so much coverage). At this point it's just a cheap knockoff of everything google does. Has anyone ever used Yahoo mail? It's a POS, it's bloated, slow, prone to failure - and it doesn't even work on linux. Same thing for yahoo maps, news, search, etc. I just don't get it.
Re: Yahoo employees: Get out now before the vultures descend
#105Re: Yahoo employees: Get out now before the vultures descend
#106Re: Yahoo employees: Get out now before the vultures descend
#107Re: Yahoo employees: Get out now before the vultures descend
#108Earlier quoted context omitted.
I really would rather avoid this option. I'm not worried that it'll make me look bad to other employers, but how it will reflect on the team that I was signed up for.
If they can't afford you, it's economics, nothing personal. Nobody works for free.
Re: Yahoo employees: Get out now before the vultures descend
#109I remember this type of Schadenfreude during the tech collapse in 2000. People seemed to just love hearing about other people losing their jobs. This editorial certainly has undertones of wanting to accelerate the collapse of Yahoo. Be careful what you wish for.
Re: Yahoo employees: Get out now before the vultures descend
#110It's weird to see Y! get a lot of hate on HN, because it seems like working there would be a lot like working at a startup. You're trading off risk (will this company exist in n years) for reward (higher salary, greater control over job responsibilities). The best Y! employees also probably have a ton of visibility, working on projects like Hadoop, YUI, YQL, and so on. What's wrong with this analogy?
Well, working at a startup is rewarding because you have a small team of peers, very little bureaucracy or management overhead, no legacy to deal with, etc. I don't think the analogy addresses the core reasons why you'd pick a startup.