I genuinely couldn't tell if the author was being sarcastic when he said Larry Ellison was down on his luck because he dropped from 5th richest to 10th richest (and the whole thing about pulling himself out of the gutters by clawing up to 5th richest again).
Databases in 2021: A Year in Review
101–110 of 136 posts
Re: Databases in 2021: A Year in Review
#102Wow I kind of feel like I'm reading about Javascript frameworks. I don't recognize any of the dbs or companies/projects. Didn't realize the db world was so busy
Re: Databases in 2021: A Year in Review
#103Databases in 2030: SQL DB finally succumbs to Graph DB as #1 Does anyone else feel like a caveman when modeling a many to many relationship in a normalized schema, and then querying via SQL? I’m surprised graph DBs aren’t more popular for this reason alone. Maybe it’s a far fetched dream, but perhaps a graph frontend can be slapped onto the Postgres backend.
Graph databases will not overtake relational databases in 2030 by marketshare.
Bookmark this comment. Reach out to me in 2030. If I'm wrong, I will replace my official CMU photo with one of me wearing a shirt that says "Graph Databases Are #1". I will use that photo until I retire, get fired, or a former student stabs me.
Re: Databases in 2021: A Year in Review
#104Re: Databases in 2021: A Year in Review
#105ELI5, why do people still choose to use mongo?
Re: Databases in 2021: A Year in Review
#106> Databases Are the Most Important Thing in My Life After My Family > I even broke up with a girlfriend once because of sloppy benchmark results. I can't say I can relate, but I do appreciate being this passionate about things!
Professional lives should be separate from personal but please, indulge us with a story!
Re: Databases in 2021: A Year in Review
#107Re: Databases in 2021: A Year in Review
#108What are the distributed options for Postgres? What mechanisms are available to make it highly available i.e. with a distributed consensus protocol for strict serializability when failing over the primary? How do people typically deploy Postgres as a cluster? 1. Async replication tolerating data loss from slightly stale backup after a failover? 2. Sync replication tolerating downtime during manual failover? 3. Distri…
Re: Databases in 2021: A Year in Review
#109Looking forward, instead of backward, it would be great for databases to have some kind of live-patch/ live-update feature so that one does not need any downtime at all if some rules are obeyed (with an automatic check, if that is the case). The same is for operating systems, where we have parts of the technology and even some limited deployment, but nothing of it is the default as far as I know. This situation makes it quite a bit harder to develop and maintain systems without introducing extreme complexity. It does not look like we will have less bugs/ less patches any time soon so we should make updating as easy as possible to drastically reduce the need for a maintenance window without resorting to building clusters for everything.
Re: Databases in 2021: A Year in Review
#110Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which part most impressed you and which part seems like magic? Their devs / contributors are active on here...
edit: not sure why the downvotes (-3 so far) since I just stated my experience on the project. There must be something blatantly wrong in what I wrote and I would appreciate criticism. -------- An architect demoed the failure of a shard and the automatic promotion of its backup shard to main, in production. They actually test their failure models. As I see it, sharding is not very hard. HA is not very hard given a re…