Live data from Hacker News

MacKichan Software, maker of Scientific Word, has gone out of business

mackichan.com

101–110 of 143 posts

Re: MacKichan Software, maker of Scientific Word, has gone out of business

#101

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, that young, entrepreneurial programmer can be found, but won’t have the domain knowledge. Look at the examples above. You can’t sell Marine mapping software without knowing something about marine navigation. You can’t sell beekeeping software without understanding beekeeping. Plus you need the general business operation skills. Finding a programmer who knows beekeeping and wants to take on a low growth business…

Yep. There may be 'takers', but will the existing customers want to work with them? So many solo/indie niche packages are built on the relationships, and replacing those - and the trust around them - is hard. A client told me about someone they knew who did ballroom dancing software - it kept track of competitions, standings, etc. And... it seemed like decent money, looking at the pricing, and the size of the market.…

Yes, but I was talking more about "passing on" the knowledge/experience (as opposed to losing it and start anew).

Regarding your "The One Way", sometimes that one way is actually the one that works better, as it was developed and fine tuned over the years by a dedicated programmer that had constant feedback by users.

Probably that ballroom dancing software had a way to input (or present/output) data in a form that makes sense to the users.

When suddenly comes the new (otherwise brilliant) programmer that - knowing nothing on the specific field - invents his/her own way to input data or render it that the users find awkward or slower or less intuitive or whatever, with the new program that cannot import old data (or imports partially), that cannot use the same B&W printer because the output is highlighted with colours and not with bolding/underlining, etc..

No surprise that the users of the old software (if it is still working) won't jump on the new bandwagon.

Re: MacKichan Software, maker of Scientific Word, has gone out of business

#102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In 2021 there's honestly not any good reason to know about Scientific Word. It was a good product 20 years ago, but it doesn't bring much to the table today that you'd have a reason to pay for.

What was it good at 20 years ago? What is it missing now?

It made it easy to create latex documents without having to type latex code. It was especially handy for creating equations and tables. I don't know that it's missing anything today, it just doesn't provide a lot of value over something like LyX (that is open source and doesn't cost anything) or even a good markdown editor.

Re: MacKichan Software, maker of Scientific Word, has gone out of business

#103

Another example of abusive license: "If you need to install your software on a new or different computer, you will need to re-activate the software on that computer using that serial number. [..] This contacts the MacKichan Software licensing server, which we will keep running for at least two years." The hope: "We expect to make Scientific Word an open source product eventually. Since both Scientific WorkPlace and S…

[deleted]

Re: MacKichan Software, maker of Scientific Word, has gone out of business

#105
Hmmm I've never heard about this software but I found some screenshots in google search, the UI looks a lot like another old CAS that I used in high school, "Derive" [1]. Derive was great :-)

1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derive_(computer_algebra_syste...

Re: MacKichan Software, maker of Scientific Word, has gone out of business

#106

Earlier quoted context omitted.

One issue you hit, and it sounds like they may be hitting here, is the need to pay yearly royalties or other yearly licensing fees for some of the components in their software. The company that they are paying fees to is unlikely to give them a a pass. In these cases, which are not uncommon, there is not a lot they can do. (Lots of companies have a mix of perpetual and non-perpetual users and pay royalties on the yea…

Or the software, as written, NEEDS to contact a server to ask the question "am I legit" - and to remove this need would require modifying the software and redistributing it. Of course, if the companies funds run dry, they will stop renewing the url registration, and one of us can register it, throw up a server that says "you are legit!" To every request and the problem is solved.

That “one of us will register it” is unlikely to happen. It’s easier to run a local server that handles the url or to hack the executable to ignore the check.

Re: MacKichan Software, maker of Scientific Word, has gone out of business

#108
post #26

In the age of Jupyter, Pluto.jl, SageMath, LaTeX/Overleaf Wolfram (for rich) who needs this? Better to spend time and resources improving those.

Do any of those have a CAS which is as powerful and easy to use as Scientific Notebook/Workplace?

Of course they are. Sage Math and Wolfram Mathematica are top-notch.

Re: MacKichan Software, maker of Scientific Word, has gone out of business

#109

Another example of abusive license: "If you need to install your software on a new or different computer, you will need to re-activate the software on that computer using that serial number. [..] This contacts the MacKichan Software licensing server, which we will keep running for at least two years." The hope: "We expect to make Scientific Word an open source product eventually. Since both Scientific WorkPlace and S…

Would be nice if they open sourced it now that the company doesn't exist anymore. But it seems to never pan out and people just lose access to the thing they paid for.
Post reply on HN