Academic media censorship conference censored by YouTube?

Post by CydeWeys » Fri, Feb 05, 2021, 5:57 PM UTC

catmanjan wrote: post #86

joshuamorton wrote: post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Without reading the paper, I'm about 99% positive it also would mark the data as unused, which would allow the disk space to be reclaimed and overridden. Disks aren't write once. It also likely would reindex it, meaning that you can't find it if you go looking for it unless you happen to know which disk it's in already and it hasn't been overwritten yet.

So basically recycle bin rather than shredder

Post by doh » Tue, Feb 16, 2021, 1:40 AM UTC

jfrunyon wrote: post #102

doh wrote: post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For percentage of LICENSED revenue. So if platform makes no money from the content that is being used, or they use public domain, royalty free, creative commons content or content is blocked, then it's free. The whole point is that we can offer this system exactly because we get to share the upside with the platform, rightsholders and creators.

"You have to pay us in some cases" is not the same as "free", no matter how you try to weasel it.