Earlier quoted context omitted.
> You think a guy smart enough to give birth to Bitcoin, and maintain complete anonymity while doing so and while communicating in public forums etc, would forget his private key? > You just need to remember one seed and suddenly you have billions of dollars of value stored in your brain. I don't think that's a realistic possibility. BIP39 mnemonics ("seeds") were not around in the early days. Bitcoin core software g…
So how could you use these private keys now? Considering they're not seeds. EDIT: downvoted for asking a question
Bitcoincore.org removes Satoshi's whitepaper from website after threats from CSW
101–110 of 287 posts
Re: Bitcoincore.org removes Satoshi's whitepaper from website after threats from CSW
#102Earlier quoted context omitted.
The whitepaper is why I view bitcoin’s value proposition as a gold-like store of value. Can you say more about why you think the whitepaper discourages that view?
Satoshi couldn't have thought of a solution of the scaling issues, just like Mark Zuckerberg didn't design Facebook for billions of people originally. From the paper it's clear that he would have liked if all people could have access to P2P layer, but it's just technically impossible.
[1] "It can be phased in, like:
if (blocknumber > 115000) maxblocksize = largerlimit
It can start being in versions way ahead, so by the time it reaches that block number and goes into effect, the older versions that don't have it are already obsolete. When we're near the cutoff block number, I can put an alert to old versions to make sure they know they have to upgrade."
~ Satoshi Nakamoto, on bitcointalk.org, October 04, 2010, 07:48:40 PM
[2] "Hi Mike,
I'm glad to answer any questions you have. If I get time, I ought to write a FAQ to supplement the paper. There is only one global chain.
The existing Visa credit card network processes about 15 million Internet purchases per day worldwide. Bitcoin can already scale much larger than that with existing hardware for a fraction of the cost. It never really hits a scale ceiling. If you're interested, I can go over the ways it would cope with extreme size. By Moore's Law, we can expect hardware speed to be 10 times faster in 5 years and 100 times faster in 10. Even if Bitcoin grows at crazy adoption rates, I think computer speeds will stay ahead of the number of transactions.
I don't anticipate that fees will be needed anytime soon, but if it becomes too burdensome to run a node, it is possible to run a node that only processes transactions that include a transaction fee. The owner of the node would decide the minimum fee they'll accept. Right now, such a node would get nothing, because nobody includes a fee, but if enough nodes did that, then users would get faster acceptance if they include a fee, or slower if they don't. The fee the market would settle on should be minimal. If a node requires a higher fee, that node would be passing up all transactions with lower fees. It could do more volume and probably make more money by processing as many paying transactions as it can. The transition is not controlled by some human in charge of the system though, just individuals reacting on their own to market forces.
Eventually, most nodes may be run by specialists with multiple GPU cards. For now, it's nice that anyone with a PC can play without worrying about what video card they have, and hopefully it'll stay that way for a while. More computers are shipping with fairly decent GPUs these days, so maybe later we'll transition to that."
~ Satoshi Nakamoto in correspondence with Mike Hearn
Re: Bitcoincore.org removes Satoshi's whitepaper from website after threats from CSW
#103Earlier quoted context omitted.
Are those two concepts mutually exclusive? A liquid currency that holds value in unstable economies would seem to serve both the purpose of being spendable as well as a stable investment like gold. Maybe I'm misunderstanding what it means to be "gold like" though.
No they aren't mutually exclusive. In fact sound money should be both a good store of value and a medium of exchange (in other words work well for payments). The problem is that Bitcoin's high fees has made it unsuitable for regular payments, so proponents only have the store of value explanation left.
I'm sure there are better solutions, but that's one that comes to mind.
Re: Bitcoincore.org removes Satoshi's whitepaper from website after threats from CSW
#104Craig Wright has done enough to hurt Bitcoin over the years that I effectively think of him as a canary: the fact that he is still walking around is evidence that there are no darkweb assassination markets that are not just scams or honeypots.
Re: Bitcoincore.org removes Satoshi's whitepaper from website after threats from CSW
#105"Yesterday both Bitcoin.org and Bitcoincore.org received allegations of copyright infringement of the Bitcoin whitepaper by lawyers representing Craig Steven Wright. In this letter, they claim Craig owns the copyright to the paper, the Bitcoin name, and ownership of bitcoin.org. They also claim he is Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin, and the original owner of bitcoin.org. Bitcoin.org and Bitcoinc…
Isn't that basically asking for a lawsuit in the format of "Prove that you are Satoshi or be charged with perjury" ? Why is CSW still able to play these tricks?
Re: Bitcoincore.org removes Satoshi's whitepaper from website after threats from CSW
#106Earlier quoted context omitted.
I am not a hardcore bitcoiner, but the price would fall quickly if these few controlling nodes would do something malicious. Which is against their own interest.
Probably. But a core aspect of decentralization is that you shouldn’t need to trust a few others at all.
Re: Bitcoincore.org removes Satoshi's whitepaper from website after threats from CSW
#107Earlier quoted context omitted.
Paul actively cooperates with the US justice and secret services. It is likely that his sentence will eventually be reduced.
I've read somewhere that he is being released in 2025 but can't be sure.
Re: Bitcoincore.org removes Satoshi's whitepaper from website after threats from CSW
#108Re: Bitcoincore.org removes Satoshi's whitepaper from website after threats from CSW
#109Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, he failed to produce any keys, the courier with the keys never materialized, the judge has not thrown Craig Wright in jail for contempt of court nor has be been charged with perjury. The judge seems to be mildly entertained by this and views Craig Wright as mentally ill, but won't have him committed. It is all sad and strange. There are a lot of guardrails against using the system this way, but they aren't being…
It would be an entirely different judge in a different case that would have to have him committed, not a judge in a lawsuit in which he's a party, no?
Re: Bitcoincore.org removes Satoshi's whitepaper from website after threats from CSW
#110As for why the Bitcoin Core developers were so quick to do this, the whitepaper has been a thorn in their side for years as it runs counter to the argument of Bitcoin being "digital gold" and should just be a settlement layer. So they saw this as an excuse to remove it.
I feel that /r/btc lunacy has made it's way to HN
One BTC is currently a post-tax yearly salary, a third of a tractor, at least one Bridgeport CNC lathe, 12 metric tons of cold rolled 304 stainless coil, or two springtime paid internships for folks out of high school (including their brand new Lincoln welders).
When the price goes up, it means even more people do not know what to do with resources available to them.
Kilowatt hour upon kilowatt hour that must be sequestered only because someone desired to "invest".
A modern metric to measure mediocrity, stagnation, and indecision (a hockey stick graph).