Live data from Hacker News

GnuCOBOL 3.1.1

sourceforge.net

101–110 of 232 posts

Re: GnuCOBOL 3.1.1

#101

Earlier quoted context omitted.

GnuCOBOL seems to be the de-facto standard COBOL implementation on Unix-like platforms these days, so (at least) it is a notable software. They seem to have no actual blog, so the changelog is the best news link I could come up with...

I don't think this is the de-facto standard, probably moreso Microfocus, or perhaps NetCobol.

Microfocus dominates on Windows, and rightfully so. Integrating .NET with COBOL was a very good idea for both them and their clients.

Re: GnuCOBOL 3.1.1

#105
I once wrote a perceptron in cobol, just for fun.

https://github.com/victorqribeiro/perceptronCobol

It was a challenge I was able to do in about 4 hours of code I didn't find that much harder to program in a Cobol (given that you use the right IDE, I wrote it in Gedit and the identation was a pain at first)

Re: GnuCOBOL 3.1.1

#106
post #21

And they say only Rust makes it to the front page of HN. More seriously is this release particularly notable in the COBOL world? I know very little about the language and I find it odd to find the Changelog of a minor release at the top of the frontpage.

GnuCOBOL seems to be the de-facto standard COBOL implementation on Unix-like platforms these days, so (at least) it is a notable software. They seem to have no actual blog, so the changelog is the best news link I could come up with...

Nope, that place is reserved for MicroFocus and Fujistu.

Re: GnuCOBOL 3.1.1

#107

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think this is the de-facto standard, probably moreso Microfocus, or perhaps NetCobol.

Microfocus dominates on Windows, and rightfully so. Integrating .NET with COBOL was a very good idea for both them and their clients.

They also have the Java version.

Re: GnuCOBOL 3.1.1

#108

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I doubt that very many Swedes in IT works for less than 30.000SEK, so I would assume USD.

My guess would be EUR. In most of the Europe people don't mentally convert to USD but to EUR.

That kinda depends, as a Dane I honestly only ever need to think in EUR when I shop online from Germany. I do however need to convert from DKK to USD and back much more frequently when reading news online.

Technically most of Europe don't need convert to EUR, they already use Euros so they're also more likely to need to convert to USD.

Re: GnuCOBOL 3.1.1

#109
post #62

Its awful that most people here are criticizing COBOL, yet they don't even know it, but they just "heard bad things about it". In my country and in Sweden it is quite easy to get good and stable job in banking/insurance/consulting business with Cobol on Z/OS. Salary is around 10-30k PER MONTH. Around 3x more then in let's say Java.

I’ve always heard COBOL devs referred to as either highly paid consultants keeping critical applications alive for corporations or wage slaves maintaining a painful app for below average pay.

I've heard it's the computer science equivalent of a plumber or janitor. The job doesn't sound particularly fun, but because of this it's high demand and great pay. It's a good job if you accept that work isn't fun, and you don't care about climbing the ladder, you're just looking for a decent, reliable income.

Re: GnuCOBOL 3.1.1

#110
I've spent the last three years translating COBOL programs off of an HP3000 in to to SQL-backended web-apps and can say as a non-Programmer who was given a pile of COBOL source to decompile, I like its simplicity and ease of readability. Most of the code is from the 80's or 90's but is well commented and easy to work with and understand. Speaking of, most of this code still works or was in use until 2-3 years ago--on the HP3000. Its a testament to how long this stuff can be kept useful. Also, the COBOL team here wasn't astoundingly well paid, but good stable and low-stress jobs in the middle-range of local income is something that is becoming harder and harder to find.
Post reply on HN