Live data from Hacker News

XP Paint – A Web-Based Version of Window XP's MS Paint

chowderman.github.io

101–110 of 111 posts

Re: XP Paint – A Web-Based Version of Window XP's MS Paint

#101
post #100

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's... an unfortunate name. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Savile

Nonsense. Jim is a very common name, too widespread to be impacted by one bad guy.

GP wasn't comparing just the name "Jim", it was comparing "Jim'll Paint It" to "Jim'll Fix It".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim%27ll_Fix_It

Re: XP Paint – A Web-Based Version of Window XP's MS Paint

#102
post #100

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nonsense. Jim is a very common name, too widespread to be impacted by one bad guy.

GP wasn't comparing just the name "Jim" , it was comparing "Jim'll Paint It" to "Jim'll Fix It" . https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim%27ll_Fix_It

Okay, now I understand their point. Strange not to link it though.

Re: XP Paint – A Web-Based Version of Window XP's MS Paint

#103
post #88

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I recommend everyone on HN using Windows to use Chocolatey and Chocolatey GUI to install their software. Chocolatey is a package manager / "app store" for FOSS and other free-to-install software on Windows. Downloading random installers was always flawed, but it's not getting any better. Chocolatey is the best you can get as a Homebrew/Homebrew Cask equivalent on Windows, and even if it takes some getting used to is…

These days I prefer https://scoop.sh/ . Chocolatey is fine but it would sometimes cause problems which I frankly don't remember. With scoop I've had no issues.

Yeah, whichever package manager you use is a huge improvement over working your way through dodgy ad-ridden websites and installers.

I'm guessing the HN crowd can use either. A big plus for Chocolatey is that it has an official GUI (Scoop seems to have GUIs as well, but they are unofficial), which improves discoverability for everyone and makes it easier to extend the recommendation to users with lower technical skills. Chocolatey and its GUI are a bit clunky compared to my Unix-based package manager tuned taste (and Windows is missing a good sudo equivalent), but it's such a big improvement over the Windows tradition of chasing installers on the internet.

Re: XP Paint – A Web-Based Version of Window XP's MS Paint

#104
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In fact, you don't need to go to all this trouble if you don't want to. Someone has made a web-based version of paint you can use right from your browser, even if you don't have Windows installed. Link: https://chowderman.github.io/xp-paint.html

That link is … well, the link for this thread.

Just a bit of wry humor :)

Re: XP Paint – A Web-Based Version of Window XP's MS Paint

#105
Someone I know once got brief access to source code for a version of Windows that included paint. He had just a few mins with it and opened up the source to paint because he liked the software. One of the variable names was something like “fluffy_bunny_rabbit” and he read a comment that said “this fixes bug X, I don’t understand why, but just leave this code here.” Unsure if former softies can confirm this was code quality back then...

Re: XP Paint – A Web-Based Version of Window XP's MS Paint

#106

Is you like MS Paint art then you should check out Jim'll Paint It ( https://jimllpaintit.tumblr.com/ - also on facebook). He takes requests.

That's... an unfortunate name. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Savile

That's the joke.

Re: XP Paint – A Web-Based Version of Window XP's MS Paint

#107
post #67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I find Paint.NET excellent for both basic scenarios and advanced ones too (it supports layers, effects etc). Strongly recommended. https://getpaint.net It's free but it's also available in Microsoft Store as a paid product, which gets automatic updates as a small extra and mostly works as a donation towards the developer.

I love Paint .NET, but I wince every time I go to their website (which is not paint.net) to download it: the download button[1] gives me strong "clicking this will give you a shareware virus from 2005" vibe. It is also very sketchy that their website (getpaint.net) redirects to another site (dotpdn.com) for the actual download page. I power through these feelings and download it anyway, knowing what wonderful softwar…

The Windows software ecosystem is incredibly sketchy, no wonder viruses are still a thing: for some reason people hate hosting binaries but love to redirect you to fishy, ad-ridden shareware websites where a click on the wrong place will place a toolbar on your browser. I hate downloading software on Windows so much.

Re: XP Paint – A Web-Based Version of Window XP's MS Paint

#108

As much as I enjoy this, I feel for it to really shine would be a desktop version, not locked into the browser. I think a Chromium/Electron app would be fine.

I couldn't disagree more. An entire electron app just for mspaint? That's ridiculous.

I disagree with you. The way I work is based in realms of OS apps, not browser tabs. Electron is bloated, but for a 'cute' app like this I don't think it's any worse than Slack, or a Qt app. Overall, I'm less likely to use an app on a regular basis if I need to go to a website to use it.

Re: XP Paint – A Web-Based Version of Window XP's MS Paint

#109

As much as I enjoy this, I feel for it to really shine would be a desktop version, not locked into the browser. I think a Chromium/Electron app would be fine.

How will it differ? In both cases you'll be running a web browser. At least right now you don't have to install another one.

I don't want to have to go to a web address to use it.

Re: XP Paint – A Web-Based Version of Window XP's MS Paint

#110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How will it differ? In both cases you'll be running a web browser. At least right now you don't have to install another one.

I don't want to have to go to a web address to use it.

Then just make a shortcut. Depending on your browser `firefox --ssb $URL` or `chromium --app=$URL`.
Post reply on HN