Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Active students currently in the United States enrolled in such programs must depart the country or take other measures, such as transferring to a school with in-person instruction to remain in lawful status. If not, they may face immigration consequences including, but not limited to, the initiation of removal proceedings. Seems like someone didn't read the OP.
I read that. And again, this is a policy. You are not thinking this through, in my opinion. Think about this in a way an accountable official would think. Most universities don't know what they will do yet in the fall. If you make an exemption for people who are currently already in the country, what would that solve? It would artificially pick those students over those who happened to travel home for the summer. You…
No they wouldn't. I've held various (small scale) public facing offices before and this isn't how I would think.
Thinking of the consequences of your actions is a very important thing.
> If you make an exemption for people who are currently already in the country, what would that solve?
Decrease the damage done?
> So you have to craft such a "heavy handed" rule in such a way that it doesn't have loop holes that can be exploited. Don't think lawyers didn't review this exemption for weeks.
They probably didn't. We've seen this administration do bullshit orders before. This isn't a new one. Remember when they banned green card holders from coming to the US and there was chaos for 12-24 hours until they came and said whoops those are exempted?
> And my earlier points still stand.
Your wrong points do stand, yes.
> But understand where it comes from
I do. It's bullshit.