Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Our successful societies originated in a state of constant (public) surveillance Not at all true. Especially in contrast to today. People actually had a lot of privacy on every possible metric. edit: Or asked differently: What was surveilled and through which channels?
People lived in small communities where other people were able to observe them. They were forced to interact with others through church and just basic market transactions (you go to the general store, you don’t order something on amazon). At harvest time everyone worked together to get everything done. The communities were small enough so that other people could detect patterns of antisocial behavior. That alone disc…
in a very limited way, with even less tools than today. Scale is a factor but there are a million other factors in "tightly knight communities" that corrected for what you call "antisocial" behavior.
I think you mean policing. The societal worth doesn't need to be established here.
Surveillance is the act of looking for suspicious behavior with the intent to find flaws. That wasn't a requirement to a society. If anything, these ideas lead to witch hunts.
Living closer together is not just mutual surveillance. That would be quite the stretch.