Live data from Hacker News

Google proposes changes to Chromium which would disable uBlock Origin

bugs.chromium.org

101–110 of 779 posts

Re: Google proposes changes to Chromium which would disable uBlock Origin

#101

Well, highly recommend Firefox. Works great after the updates last year and even use it on mobile. It bothers me that iOS doesn’t support addons to Firefox mobile. But on Android you can even install ublock origin

The only problem with Firefox is the UI when they redesign a great slick Ui like chrome this browser game will change

agree completely, I started Firefox many times and each time left it because of the interface.

Re: Google proposes changes to Chromium which would disable uBlock Origin

#102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

With the news that Edge would switch to chromium, Firefox is really the only thing preventing a complete web browser monoculture. Support Firefox if you can!

> Firefox is really the only thing preventing a complete web browser monoculture WebKit?

Trading Google overlords for Apple overlords does not seem like an upgrade.

Re: Google proposes changes to Chromium which would disable uBlock Origin

#104
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yep, made the switch to Firefox with DuckDuckGo little less than a year ago. It was surprisingly fast to get used to and I haven't been more at ease since. I highly recommend trying this out for at least 1 week for everyone out here!

With the news that Edge would switch to chromium, Firefox is really the only thing preventing a complete web browser monoculture. Support Firefox if you can!

Edge moving to Chromium has handed Google a lot of extra power which gives them the ability to make changes like this.

Re: Google proposes changes to Chromium which would disable uBlock Origin

#105

Another reason to be glad that Firefox is still standing.

I really just don't understand the obsession with Chrome, especially in hacker communities. Sorry Google, I feel "icky & gross" when I use you.

Most of my logins have been syncd via Chrome. Makes logging into a new computer a breeze, or if I need to borrow someone else's stuff really quick.

Re: Google proposes changes to Chromium which would disable uBlock Origin

#106
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It fast. That most important thing.

Firefox on Windows is no slower as far as I can tell, and renders fonts better. Firefox on Mac is noticeably slower.

Agreed. While I still use it, Firefox on Mac just hangs on some js-intensive sites.

Re: Google proposes changes to Chromium which would disable uBlock Origin

#107
post #62

> we will strive to limit the blocking version of webRequest, potentially removing blocking options from most events Is there any rationale why?

The "blocking version of webRequest" means that page loading stalls until the extension decides whether to allow, deny or modify each request. This gives extensions enormous power, which can easily ruin user experience if the extension is slow about handling requests.

Re: Google proposes changes to Chromium which would disable uBlock Origin

#108

I don't understand the technical details of this - could someone explain it to an idiot? - Is the change specifically to block ad blockers, or uBlock specifically? Or is it just a new extension API? - Could ad blockers adapt to the new version to work again? I am reminded of the new version of (Mac) Safari, which features a new extensions API. It took a while for them to appear but there are now good ad blocking exte…

Looks like they are removing blocking API from extensions, and replacing it with buildin Chrome blocker (limited to 30K rule entries).

Re: Google proposes changes to Chromium which would disable uBlock Origin

#109
Could someone please help explain the technical details of this?

From what I can gather from the chrome.webRequest and chrome.declarativeNetRequest documentation, it looks like this change would make it difficult to have long lists of blocked hosts, or perhaps to update such lists automatically. Obviously there is a conflict of interest here for Google, but it looks like there are at least a few non-bogus justifications for the proposed change.

See also (especially the section "Comparison with the webRequest API): https://developers.chrome.com/extensions/declarativeNetReque...

Re: Google proposes changes to Chromium which would disable uBlock Origin

#110
post #94

Another reason to be glad that Firefox is still standing.

Someone correct me, but can’t ad blockers just be installed through the OS and not be dependent on the browser? I recall this is what I had to do for Safari since there wasn’t a supported extension for the new browser yet. This would lessen our dependency on a browser for ad blocking in this ongoing browser war.

how does this interact with TLS, particularly DNS over TLS? An OS level http proxy would have to MITM the TLS stream.
Post reply on HN