Live data from Hacker News

Labor Board Backs Startup Engineers Fired for Unionizing

wired.com

101–109 of 109 posts

Re: Labor Board Backs Startup Engineers Fired for Unionizing

#101

I'm firmly convinced that tech workers will come around to unionizing once they accidentally reinvent it under a different name

As usual, we never seem to be able to learn from the past, except by accidentally reinventing it under a different name. I wonder why the software industry is so uniquely stricken by such monumental hubris?

Re: Labor Board Backs Startup Engineers Fired for Unionizing

#102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

At each of the companies I've worked at in this field, management and developers had a close and healthy relationship. Introducing collective bargaining would only have created an artificial distance between individuals. One company stands out as a good example. Great benefits, sub par pay. They actively solicited feedback on a regular basis, and at one point gave out near universal raises when they introduced pay ba…

>In short, we got everything we needed, and it has been fair. Some employees individually bargained for more time off, or for work from home time, or higher pay. There is nothing preventing a union from bargaining a system like this. We have this at my work. Everyone gets 20days off for holiday, but other than that we have a 12.5% annual bonus ('13th month') with a system where people can opt for 7.5% bonus in return…

A union could bargain for that, true. But, when you've already got it, there's a real concern that starting one will make difficult the already good relationship with management.

Re: Labor Board Backs Startup Engineers Fired for Unionizing

#103

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wages set by the free market can be below what is necessary to survive, and it is our job as citizens to ensure public policy exists (and yes, unions) to ensure wage floors that allow people to live with dignity and without chronic stress from the fear of destitution. You don’t have to agree with this sentiment of course, that’s what votes, elections, and the ability to organize are for.

> Wages set by the free market can be below what is necessary to survive ... and this conveys the fact that the work to be done, isn't considered valuable enough to support a human life. Making these kinds of jobs illegal just puts them out-of-reach of youths and speeds up the perennially-villified yet inevitable process of automation.

[deleted]

Re: Labor Board Backs Startup Engineers Fired for Unionizing

#104
post #72

> The tipping point came in January, when management offered additional stock to a handful of high-level male engineers, including Westergard. Employees suspected Lanetix planned to fire lower-level female engineers, many of whom graduated from Hackbright, an all women’s coding boot camp, as did the female engineer fired in November. What's the full story here? Layoffs typically happen when a company has cashflow iss…

there's something more to this story.

Maybe I’m just hopelessly jejune but I find it hard to believe in 2018 moustache-twiddling top-hat wearing Capitalist fatcats were like bwahahaha let’s sack all the women.

Of course they absolutely deserve to be sued into oblivion, I just don’t see the gender angle, correlation is not causation.

Edit: oh I see, they were hired from a gender-segregated bootcamp. So sexism is baked into the company’s DNA.

Re: Labor Board Backs Startup Engineers Fired for Unionizing

#105

I'm firmly convinced that tech workers will come around to unionizing once they accidentally reinvent it under a different name

Personal anecdata: every company I've worked at would have been worse off (and worse to work at) if the developers had been unionized. I've also avoided working anywhere that thinks you can only be professional if you're wearing a button down shirt and / or a tie, so I don't doubt that some places might benefit. Edit: to be clear, I've never advocated for a union, and I doubt I ever will so long as I am fortunate eno…

I doubt I ever will so long as I am fortunate enough

Think of it as insurance. When misfortune strikes - it will be too late.

Re: Labor Board Backs Startup Engineers Fired for Unionizing

#106
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Genuine question: Do other high-skilled professions have unions (like marketeers, scientists, lawyers, doctors, electrical engineers, ...)?

In Alberta, Canada, professional engineers are barred from joining unions. While not universal, it is quite common for provincial engineering associations to bar their members from joining unions. Engineers are also exempt from many labour law protections (overtime, minimum wage, vacation time, etc.). Needless to say, I am not exactly happy with the current state of affairs.

In the UK I quit the IMechE when I realised it existed to serve large employers, not its individual members.

Re: Labor Board Backs Startup Engineers Fired for Unionizing

#107

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Engineers, Lawyers and Doctors have professional associations rather than unions. Arguably, this is what software engineer should have. The American Medical Association (AMA) is extraordinarily influential. Edit: one could argue the difference between a professional association and a union is a matter of degrees. A professional association certainly seems an easier sell. Possibly a professional association with aspec…

All of those professional associations were enshrined with their exclusive rights by law. We live in a democracy, and the law is at least nominally enacted for the public good. The case for requiring professional licensure was that it would protect the public from unqualified practitioners, and it would allow bad apples to be held to account. If you want a professional association like engineers, lawyers or doctors,…

If you want a professional association like engineers, lawyers or doctors, it needs to have a clear public benefit. Benefiting software developers is not enough. That is one of the important differences between a professional association and a union.

I think in practice, the line is much fuzzier than you describe. Union rights are also written into law with the implication that they benefit society directly and indirectly. An electricians' union at least ostensibly benefits society through making certain qualified people engage in electrical work and even having qualified medical attendants has obvious benefits.

Of course, one can point to huge potential benefits to society from making certain that various sorts of software is constructed correctly so the case for a professional software engineers' association isn't that hard.

Re: Labor Board Backs Startup Engineers Fired for Unionizing

#108
post #105

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Personal anecdata: every company I've worked at would have been worse off (and worse to work at) if the developers had been unionized. I've also avoided working anywhere that thinks you can only be professional if you're wearing a button down shirt and / or a tie, so I don't doubt that some places might benefit. Edit: to be clear, I've never advocated for a union, and I doubt I ever will so long as I am fortunate eno…

I doubt I ever will so long as I am fortunate enough Think of it as insurance. When misfortune strikes - it will be too late.

I think in that case I would be better off putting the money in savings than paying into dues.

Re: Labor Board Backs Startup Engineers Fired for Unionizing

#109
post #105

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I doubt I ever will so long as I am fortunate enough Think of it as insurance. When misfortune strikes - it will be too late.

I think in that case I would be better off putting the money in savings than paying into dues.

Is there not at least two orders or magnitude difference between union dues and meaningful savings? Maybe even three or four!
Post reply on HN