You can type nonsense words into this --- words for which Google will say no page in its entire corpus has a match --- and get color palettes back. What's it actually doing?
Google, but for colors
101–108 of 108 posts
Re: Google, but for colors
#102But maybe it's just hug of death..
Re: Google, but for colors
#103It cannot do "lego" But maybe it's just hug of death..
Re: Google, but for colors
#104It cannot do "lego" But maybe it's just hug of death..
Re: Google, but for colors
#105Earlier quoted context omitted.
Looks like Google image search always has a fallback for a nonsense search query, and the images between Google and Picular exactly match (if you hover over the bottom-right of any color card, it shows the source image): https://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch&q=sdlkfjsldkfjsldfkj https://picular.co/sdlkfjsldkfjsldfkj If you put it in quotes, though, Google gives no results and Picular crashes (500 internal server err…
Fixed! There's now a color palette for "sdlkfjsldkfjsldfkj" ;)
My guess is you're still doing a Google Image search, but when it returns no results, you return something random and cache this query for consistency. Is that about right?.
Re: Google, but for colors
#106Re: Google, but for colors
#107Earlier quoted context omitted.
Fixed! There's now a color palette for "sdlkfjsldkfjsldfkj" ;)
What did you change? My guess is you're still doing a Google Image search, but when it returns no results, you return something random and cache this query for consistency. Is that about right?.