Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've been thinking about this and I think a tricky part is editing, since naturally people are going to want to edit the video for normal reasons but I think that will mess with the signature? I guess you could always have the unedited version posted and verified, but that has its own difficulties too.
This is why a sort of chain of evidence would be required.
We’re underestimating the mind-warping potential of fake video
101–108 of 108 posts
Re: We’re underestimating the mind-warping potential of fake video
#102Earlier quoted context omitted.
If only we had some kind of decentralized consensus system that could help us formulate truth on a societal scale...
I sense you're being tongue-in-cheek, but how would something like blockchain help this situation? (I genuinely don't understand -- can you walk me through how that tech would validate a video's authenticity?) Second, it would only help to validate that a video was taken (and possibly that it was not modified? But I suspect a great deal of video footage gets modified after capture, for light balancing and whatnot.) B…
Re: We’re underestimating the mind-warping potential of fake video
#103Earlier quoted context omitted.
Technical knowledge doesn't seem requisite. Only independent verifiability. In the same way that signing keys are used by infrastructure & many who don't understand the nuances.
Ya you could get an end result where your video player included in the videos infos "officially verified by persons x y & z"
Re: We’re underestimating the mind-warping potential of fake video
#104This would be great for enforcing copyright on sites like youtube.
Re: We’re underestimating the mind-warping potential of fake video
#105Earlier quoted context omitted.
I sense you're being tongue-in-cheek, but how would something like blockchain help this situation? (I genuinely don't understand -- can you walk me through how that tech would validate a video's authenticity?) Second, it would only help to validate that a video was taken (and possibly that it was not modified? But I suspect a great deal of video footage gets modified after capture, for light balancing and whatnot.) B…
Decentralized reputation system that uses Proof of Stake to validate the "truthiness" of an individual. Users validate an idea/content by sharing some of their reputation to lend credibility to another.
Re: We’re underestimating the mind-warping potential of fake video
#106Anyone know of technology to invisibly watermark video/audio? This would be great for enforcing copyright on sites like youtube.
Re: We’re underestimating the mind-warping potential of fake video
#107Earlier quoted context omitted.
I sense you're being tongue-in-cheek, but how would something like blockchain help this situation? (I genuinely don't understand -- can you walk me through how that tech would validate a video's authenticity?) Second, it would only help to validate that a video was taken (and possibly that it was not modified? But I suspect a great deal of video footage gets modified after capture, for light balancing and whatnot.) B…
Decentralized reputation system that uses Proof of Stake to validate the "truthiness" of an individual. Users validate an idea/content by sharing some of their reputation to lend credibility to another.
Re: We’re underestimating the mind-warping potential of fake video
#108Earlier quoted context omitted.
Decentralized reputation system that uses Proof of Stake to validate the "truthiness" of an individual. Users validate an idea/content by sharing some of their reputation to lend credibility to another.
Isn't think what PageRank is? I have a website; by linking to you, I am vouching in a public space that I believe in your truthiness?