The NYT is so pro-establishment it is probably the last site on Earth that would have its domain taken away from them.
The New York Times Is Now Available as a Tor Onion Service
101–110 of 205 posts
Re: The New York Times Is Now Available as a Tor Onion Service
#102The NYT is so pro-establishment it is probably the last site on Earth that would have its domain taken away from them.
Re: The New York Times Is Now Available as a Tor Onion Service
#103The NYT is so pro-establishment it is probably the last site on Earth that would have its domain taken away from them.
Trump would disagree.
Re: The New York Times Is Now Available as a Tor Onion Service
#104Comical attempt to give Street cred to the NYT.
Re: The New York Times Is Now Available as a Tor Onion Service
#105What would be the advantage here?
Why would anyone run a legal onion service?
Thanks Alec Muffett (OP) for the following summary copied from this comment
Understandably folk tend to think "Anonymity!" when talking about Tor Onions, but in rolling out the Facebook onion we established several clear benefits:
1. better and safer experience for people accessing over Tor: no interference by exit nodes, no bandwidth-contention for exit nodes, no use of exit nodes at all.
2. "good neighbour" - reciprocally, popular sites can unload themselves from eating up scarce exit-node bandwidth.
3. "a peace offering" - people (continue to) use Facebook over Tor; 3 years ago we saw 500,000/month, more recently ~1 million. Overwhelmingly we found (through measurement and assessment) that people using Facebook over Tor were ordinary folk wanting to do ordinary things. especially in times of political crisis. Providing a metaphorical "olive branch" showed that we value their use of the site.
4. Discretion & Trust. Onion Sites are considered to be about "Anonymity", but really they offer two more features: Discretion (eg: your employer or ISP cannot see what you are browsing, not even what site) and trust (if you access facebookcorewwwi.onion you are definitely connected to Facebook, because of the nature of Onion addressing; no DNS or CA shenanigans are applicable.)
[0]: https://www.reddit.com/r/TOR/comments/792mfr/the_new_york_ti...
Re: The New York Times Is Now Available as a Tor Onion Service
#106What would be the advantage here?
Re: The New York Times Is Now Available as a Tor Onion Service
#107What would be the advantage here?
Re: The New York Times Is Now Available as a Tor Onion Service
#108What would be the advantage here?
>The New York Times reports on stories all over the world, and our reporting is read by people around the world. Some readers choose to use Tor to access our journalism because they’re technically blocked from accessing our website; or because they worry about local network monitoring; or because they care about online privacy; or simply because that is the method that they prefer.
Re: The New York Times Is Now Available as a Tor Onion Service
#109Earlier quoted context omitted.
I recall that Facebook brute forced their way into having an onion url that was easy to remember, by generating millions of them and then picking one that was simple.
Its something like facebookcorewwwi.onion - that must have taken a lot of cycles to generate..
Re: The New York Times Is Now Available as a Tor Onion Service
#110Does anyone know why they posted this story through Medium?
TimesOpen is an engineer-driven blog. Its previous incarnation was self-hosted on a WordPress stack (separate from our main CMS), but for various reasons it was decided to re-platform. There were many discussions before settling on Medium and alternatives were considered (such as dogfooding our own CMS). We have a lot of work in-flight to modernize and simplify our publishing stack, and the timing wasn't right to rel…