101–103 of 103 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe you should read the last sentence again. I think perhaps you missed something.
hah! sorry about that, i indeed did! That said, if you have to explain your joke, you've failed :) It was too long!
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Bulma is very far behind. * Lacks all the JS components * Lifts from Bootstrap for most of the CSS components, sometimes down to the class name * Makes the mistakes of early Bootstrap, namely heavily nested classes like .card .media:not(:last-child) that are difficult to overwrite and cause great pain when customizing * Uses antiquated non-extensible syntax/naming conventions for breakpoints, such as "is-desktop" ins…
Coming from BS3+jQuery, BS3/4 was confusing or obtuse to use the jQuery dependent parts with VueJS (modal being a good example). Most BS+VueJS libraries were incomplete or broken somewhere in the VueJS 1 => 2 shuffle. Bulma was not confusing, it's JS agnosticism being the main reason.
Tachyons [2] is another CSS framework that basically takes the component approach to the extreme and makes all styles separate, like bootstrap being made of only utilities.