Earlier quoted context omitted.
there's no such thing as morals or utility, really Just to counterpoint the frenzy of moral nihilism and relativism I suspect will appear, I respectfully disagree, I'm a moral universalist, i.e. morals do exist, moral judgements can be true or false. But I also realize that this is a question of philosophical faith, and arguing about that is usually pretty futile. :)
A few questions: 1. Given the laws of physics, could you derive your morality? 2. If we didn't exist, and in our place were an alien species that, say, ate their babies[1], would that make the universe contain less utility as a whole? [1] The same story I linked to above: http://lesswrong.com/lw/y4/three_worlds_collide_08/ . Who is in the right? Do we have the "moral imperative" to destroy the baby-eaters? Do the thi…
2) You're asking me to sum up and compare the values of two complete civilizations? That's a pretty tall order. Also, in one of the alternatives I wouldn't exist, that's a lot less utility right there.