We've been using gitlab for most VideoLAN projects, and are moving towards it for all of them (including vlc and x264). A lot of things are great, and going in the right direction, but the issues tracker is really lacking. The lack of custom fields, that you find in all other bugtrackers except github, and the lack of dependent issues are really blocking us to move full to gitlab. And the biggest issue is that they'r…
Gitlab 9.0
101–110 of 164 posts
Re: Gitlab 9.0
#102I love and use Gitlab and am excited about the 9.0 performance improvements. On the other hand, I found it absurdly difficult to get feedback or action from Gitlab on an MR. There was an MR that fixed a critical problem in the virtualbox runner, and it sat there for about 5 months with no response to either the original submitter or my emails to gitlab/gitlab ci maintainers. About a month ago I finally decided to abu…
Thanks for writing that comment and making us aware of that case. I'm very sorry that it did that long to get reviewed and merged. The number of issues and merge requests that pass our hands is just crazy and sometimes it happens that some of them are oversight and not properly scheduled. Having people to be persistent, like you, makes them finally to be merged and be part of the product. Thank you for doing that! From our side, we will try our best to make this process to be more efficient.
Kamil, CI/CD Lead at GitLab
Re: Gitlab 9.0
#103I am having problem with de CI/CD after update: ``` Running with gitlab-ci-multi-runner 9.0.0[...] Cloning repository... Cloning into '/builds/xxxxxxx'... warning: You appear to have cloned an empty repository. Checking out xxxxxxx as master... fatal: reference is not a tree: xxxxxx ```
I rebooted de entire machine and it is working now
Re: Gitlab 9.0
#104We've been using gitlab for most VideoLAN projects, and are moving towards it for all of them (including vlc and x264). A lot of things are great, and going in the right direction, but the issues tracker is really lacking. The lack of custom fields, that you find in all other bugtrackers except github, and the lack of dependent issues are really blocking us to move full to gitlab. And the biggest issue is that they'r…
Both of these features are not scheduled for development yet. We scope work out month to month, so we can't promise anything regarding those at this time. But we are discussing them as you see in the issues and considering how they would fit into our product as we recognize they are important features for many teams.
For relations between issues, we are considering various designs, such as: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/1941 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/29444.
Re: Gitlab 9.0
#105Re: Gitlab 9.0
#106Earlier quoted context omitted.
Taking a look at Gitaly & the conversations around it, I don't see much in the way of consensus. Are you using Redis for the distributed lock or is this still a centralized system? My query being you can effectively use the native pre-receive hooks & wrap the git shell to allow consensus without needing to replace git with an RPC system like Gitaly.
Gitaly is still a centralized system. It shards the git repositories over multiple git servers in one datacenter. We looked into Git Ketch https://www.infoq.com/news/2016/02/google-kick-starts-git-ke... for a distributed system based on hooks. But this requires a sync per repository (very slow with 100k+ repos per server) and it is no longer actively being worked on by Google.
A little while ago I spent a night and I was able to get a fully distributed git http server up and running. I used HBase and was able to get it most things working. That allows the only contention to be around refs. Everything else is well distributed and spread across as many machines as you need. Caching is handled on the key value store side, and the http server side. I didn't get to git gc work though.
Re: Gitlab 9.0
#107We've been using gitlab for most VideoLAN projects, and are moving towards it for all of them (including vlc and x264). A lot of things are great, and going in the right direction, but the issues tracker is really lacking. The lack of custom fields, that you find in all other bugtrackers except github, and the lack of dependent issues are really blocking us to move full to gitlab. And the biggest issue is that they'r…
Thanks for using GitLab. We have open sourced features based on your request before https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10931690 I can't promise anything regarding these features. Especially custom fields are a typical EE feature in our perspective. The dependent issues feature proposal https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/4058#note_249... is still on the CE tracker but I'm not sure what it's future is.
It's just that I really want to quit using trac, who is slow and not integrated with the rest of the infrastructure.
Re: Gitlab 9.0
#108I love and use Gitlab and am excited about the 9.0 performance improvements. On the other hand, I found it absurdly difficult to get feedback or action from Gitlab on an MR. There was an MR that fixed a critical problem in the virtualbox runner, and it sat there for about 5 months with no response to either the original submitter or my emails to gitlab/gitlab ci maintainers. About a month ago I finally decided to abu…
Hi janciska, Thanks for writing that comment and making us aware of that case. I'm very sorry that it did that long to get reviewed and merged. The number of issues and merge requests that pass our hands is just crazy and sometimes it happens that some of them are oversight and not properly scheduled. Having people to be persistent, like you, makes them finally to be merged and be part of the product. Thank you for d…
Can GitLab have a hands-on demo at the upcoming DataOps Summit in Boston? https://www.dataopssummit.com/
Re: Gitlab 9.0
#109I love and use Gitlab and am excited about the 9.0 performance improvements. On the other hand, I found it absurdly difficult to get feedback or action from Gitlab on an MR. There was an MR that fixed a critical problem in the virtualbox runner, and it sat there for about 5 months with no response to either the original submitter or my emails to gitlab/gitlab ci maintainers. About a month ago I finally decided to abu…
As Kamil already wrote, the number of notifications, issues and merge requests that we follow is enormous and sometimes something may be missed. I'm doing my best to have eye on everything but this is not always possible.
From my side I can only say that I'm very sorry that your work and work of all people engaged in this merge request was noticed so late. We're working on improving responsiveness in GitLab Runner project so hopefully we will avoid such delays in the future.
Tomasz, developer at GitLab, GitLab Runner project maintainer
Re: Gitlab 9.0
#110Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm glad this is a priority for you guys Sid, the one thing keeping me from using Gitlab is that it doesn't feel as snappy as Github. But as a point of reference, I'm also a guy that won't use Atom because it doesn't feel as snappy as Sublime. For some of us, speed comes first.
What's a similar editor that's faster? VS Code?