Live data from Hacker News

MIT Media Lab Disobedience Award

media.mit.edu

101–110 of 170 posts

Re: MIT Media Lab Disobedience Award

#101

Earlier quoted context omitted.

From the post : > Eligibility requirements for the $250,000 prize > The recipient must be living. So that rules out Aaron Swartz.

But it's a disobedience award, so... disobey the rules.

Or disobey disobeying the rules and do whatever you want within the rules.

Re: MIT Media Lab Disobedience Award

#102
post #95
post #54

It doesn't matter if Aaron Swartz is ineligible. We should still nominate him. We should nominate him so many times that granting the award to anyone else makes this award an obviously disingenuous publicity stunt.

Unpopular opinion: Aaron Swartz abused the trust which was placed in him by MIT as its guest when engaging in his civil disobedience, and MIT was perfectly justified not to intercede in his case. A bit like if your friend comes to your house, you tell him, "don't smoke weed outside, the cops around here will arrest you," and your friend says "I support marijuana legalization, so I'll smoke wherever I want." Your frie…

Exactly

The AS widows are becoming annoying

Re: MIT Media Lab Disobedience Award

#103
post #95
post #54

It doesn't matter if Aaron Swartz is ineligible. We should still nominate him. We should nominate him so many times that granting the award to anyone else makes this award an obviously disingenuous publicity stunt.

Unpopular opinion: Aaron Swartz abused the trust which was placed in him by MIT as its guest when engaging in his civil disobedience, and MIT was perfectly justified not to intercede in his case. A bit like if your friend comes to your house, you tell him, "don't smoke weed outside, the cops around here will arrest you," and your friend says "I support marijuana legalization, so I'll smoke wherever I want." Your frie…

That is simply not what happen. He was never warned off MIT campus. The case was never one of trespassing with MIT - otherwise he'd have been slapped on the wrist with a local case.

Rather he was arrested by a federal secret service agent for CFAA violations that were based on extremely tenuous arguments that at the least most legal commentators concede was an egregious case of over-prosecution.

I'd love to hear your list of deserving award winners who are somehow notable dissidents without breaking something as lowly as a trespass law.

Re: MIT Media Lab Disobedience Award

#106
post #98
post #20

MIT was complicit in the prosecution of Aaron Swartz for seemingly qualifying activities.

How was MIT complicit? When they involved the police, they had no idea who it was that was apparently attacking them. They just knew that an unknown party was causing serious disruptions, and was actively trying to evade their countermeasures, and had moved on to trespassing and equipment tampering. It was only after Swartz was arrested that his identity became known. Everything after that was in the hands of prosecu…

> "causing serious disruptions"

So disruptive to MIT that they didn't even notice it until JSTOR emailed.

Re: MIT Media Lab Disobedience Award

#107

The winner is almost guaranteed to be a conformist, given that the organization selecting the winner is part of the dominant, mainstream power structure. So expect the winner to be, paradoxically, someone who is completely obedient.

Yup. I submitted my application based on the FashionTech wearable I designed, built and wore to protest the lack of inclusion of any local women at a Western tech event here in Shenzhen. http://i.imgur.com/2D8dESV.jpg

I ended up stomping around a mainland Chinese tourist attraction half-naked in it, giving speeches to massive Chinese crowds about an inclusion issue. http://i.imgur.com/9Dz9M9N.jpg

Anyone who knows anything about China will tell you how unbelievably dangerous this is.

But I was protesting the MIT Media Labs best buddy Make Magazine so I'm sure my application has been directly filed in the trash- even though I'd be very surprised if anyone else applying has done anything that dangerous.

Re: MIT Media Lab Disobedience Award

#109
post #95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Unpopular opinion: Aaron Swartz abused the trust which was placed in him by MIT as its guest when engaging in his civil disobedience, and MIT was perfectly justified not to intercede in his case. A bit like if your friend comes to your house, you tell him, "don't smoke weed outside, the cops around here will arrest you," and your friend says "I support marijuana legalization, so I'll smoke wherever I want." Your frie…

Exactly The AS widows are becoming annoying

Aaron Swartz being dead is becoming annoying.
Post reply on HN