Earlier quoted context omitted.
no, they use length to describe the measurement of the crack's width. totally valid afaic.
You can't just use "length" to describe a width. It's grammatically valid but semantically incorrect. An object can't be "100m long by 100m long".
A huge crack is spreading across one of Antarctica’s biggest ice shelves
101–110 of 110 posts
Re: A huge crack is spreading across one of Antarctica’s biggest ice shelves
#102Earlier quoted context omitted.
Alternatively: Use public transit, encourage friends and family not to be wasteful, invest in alternative fuel sources, vote for people who will use taxpayer dollars to invest in alternative fuel sources, so on and so forth. What is anybody else going to do that you can't do yourself already?
While personal effort is laudable, and your kind of thinking is neccessary, it will not change things. The decisions that can actually change something are made on government level and depend on believes ingrained into culture / society. A nice example is Israel and it's shortage of water. There, children are educated from very early on (kingergarden) to be careful with and conserve water wherever possible. It's a co…
Politicians are not stupid. If the environmentalist grass roots do not believe in their cause badly enough to go and change their personal lives first, they will only receive token efforts and empty promisses. And that's because the politicians do (correctly, IMHO) assume than environmentalist only want to wash away their guilt, not achieve actual changes. As in, changes that will negatively affect their personal lives.
Of course, what environmentalist say they want is to have politicians affect everybody's lives... but in practical terms, that means to affect primarily the lives of those that are underrepresented in the political arena. Everybody else is going to push back when real cost come upfront. And since this is the same people that has been thrown under the bus by every other class and group of interest during the last few decades, they cannot be made to pay the cost.
And, more important, for the needed changes to be embraced by enough people to matter, you need a narrative that let them believe they are achieving something of value. That cannot be done with propaganda alone. They need examplars, people who have done what it takes to effect a change in their own lives, who have paid the personal costs, and who are not deprived and miserable because of it, but actually happy and even successful.
Re: A huge crack is spreading across one of Antarctica’s biggest ice shelves
#103There hasn't been very good news from the Antartic lately. After seeing the reception Brian Cox received lately by Australian senator Malcom Roberts on an episode of QanA it's pretty clear we have no hope in world leaders doing anything significant about it. There is way too much self-interest and sociopathic behaviour going on by the majority within these circles of governance and "power". Too many of us are waiting…
Why?
Re: A huge crack is spreading across one of Antarctica’s biggest ice shelves
#104Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can't just use "length" to describe a width. It's grammatically valid but semantically incorrect. An object can't be "100m long by 100m long".
but that's not how it's being used. what length of rope does it take to go around a quarter mile track? there's no ambiguity even though the track has length and width. the dimension in question was specified already, the width of the crack, so referring to the measure of that as its length is fine, no ambiguity.
Length [NOUN]: 1. the longest extent of anything as measured from end to end: the length of a river. 2. the measure of the greatest dimension of a plane or solid figure.
It's pretty unambiguously wrong. You can back into what the author meant without ambiguity, but that doesn't mean the author used the correct word.
Re: A huge crack is spreading across one of Antarctica’s biggest ice shelves
#105There hasn't been very good news from the Antartic lately. After seeing the reception Brian Cox received lately by Australian senator Malcom Roberts on an episode of QanA it's pretty clear we have no hope in world leaders doing anything significant about it. There is way too much self-interest and sociopathic behaviour going on by the majority within these circles of governance and "power". Too many of us are waiting…
> decentralisation of power production is important Why?
This was the situation in Australia until fairly recently, people wanted alternatives but there wasn't any renewable options, then when the Government changed and pulled rebates for new solar installations, it was even more unthinkable for people to get started.
Also, I'm not arguing for complete and utter decentralization, but there needs to be options.
Re: A huge crack is spreading across one of Antarctica’s biggest ice shelves
#106Earlier quoted context omitted.
If that would work, then there wouldn't be a crack there in the first place.
Why?
The only reason anyone cares that there is a crack is because it implies that the ice is shrinking.
Re: A huge crack is spreading across one of Antarctica’s biggest ice shelves
#107Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why?
Because the crack isn't the fundamental problem. The problem is that the ice sheet is too small to resist temperature changes. Purposefully making the ice sheet smaller yet only exacerbates the problem. The only reason anyone cares that there is a crack is because it implies that the ice is shrinking.
Re: A huge crack is spreading across one of Antarctica’s biggest ice shelves
#108Earlier quoted context omitted.
Oh my! I'd say that judgement is a bit premature. We are talking about a planet-scale engineering project; something that is millions of times the scale of anything that has been attempted. We have only d 13 landing on it, and only something 70 space craft have travelled to Mars or beyond[1]. We have only just found traces of water there, and who knows what else is available (or not). We have never even attempted to…
Don't mistake me. I love the idea of terraforming Mars, to the point of spending a lot of time understanding the challenges to achieving success. Conceptually there is always tech which we are yet to discover, but that just pushes the conversation into hand wavy territory, and discussing the details is always more fun. The simplest plans are to start a runaway green house effect, in order to warm the planet up. That…
Hey, something we are already good at!
To add some substance to this comment, why wouldnt we just try to terraform earth first?
Re: A huge crack is spreading across one of Antarctica’s biggest ice shelves
#109Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because the crack isn't the fundamental problem. The problem is that the ice sheet is too small to resist temperature changes. Purposefully making the ice sheet smaller yet only exacerbates the problem. The only reason anyone cares that there is a crack is because it implies that the ice is shrinking.
Why does a bigger span of ice make it more resistant to temperature changes?
Re: A huge crack is spreading across one of Antarctica’s biggest ice shelves
#110Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why does a bigger span of ice make it more resistant to temperature changes?
Lower surface area and higher albedo.
And wouldn't a larger shell expose a bigger surface area?