Live data from Hacker News

How I turned “Street Sharks” into an online social experiment

geek.com

101–110 of 118 posts

Re: How I turned “Street Sharks” into an online social experiment

#101
post #25

I don't think it's the internet's fault. In 1941 a couple of friends made a few phone calls to newspaper sports desks and concocted a college football team: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/16/sports/ncaafootball/the-41...

In 1910, a delegation of Abyssinian royals was given an official tour of the HMS Dreadnought[1]. The delegation was comprised of Virginia Woolf with a glued on beard, Horace de Vere Cole, and other members of the Bloomsbury Group.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreadnought_hoax

Re: How I turned “Street Sharks” into an online social experiment

#104

In my opinion, this prank is very intricate and took a lot of effort while not actually proving the point that "history is meaningless on the internet" because the subject matter - the Street Sharks - are/were essentially forgotten by history itself. Sometimes things just naturally slide away and nobody cares. It's like, "What year did the black Power Ranger turn good?" or "What was the top selling Rock band in the y…

> "What year did the black Power Ranger turn good?"

Was the black power ranger ever bad? I recall the green ranger going bad, then later returning, reformed, as the white ranger.

Or was mixing up the colors intentional to further your point?

Re: How I turned “Street Sharks” into an online social experiment

#105
I have done very similar stuff to Wikipedia for almost ten years now. It is astonishingly easy to make specious claims in backwater articles that no one cares about. It is pretty insane what happens to the articles afterwards. For example, on one article, someone else has made a couple of edits adding even more lies to my completely invented claims! Another "subtle vandal" (as I call myself)! I never expected that. And when someone else edits your false information for clarity, or whatever, it's as good as gold. One trick I use to encourage that is to make minor grammatical or spelling errors. If a human doesn't lumber by to edit (and then seal into fact) my bullshit information, usually an automated bot will eventually do the same thing. It's very important not to make your information sound too trite or wild. Most Wikipedia editors take everything with a big grain of salt the last few years.

Re: How I turned “Street Sharks” into an online social experiment

#107
post #66

I have done something less malicious, but right around the same time. When I was in NYU's grad math program, the Wikipedia just getting going. It had a lot of articles, but not on every topic. I was studying Analysis and decided to start the article on the Hessian Matrix. Yes, I started that article and it's been fun to watch it grow over the years. Most sections I have added are still there, as well as some phrases…

[deleted]

Re: How I turned “Street Sharks” into an online social experiment

#108
post #25

I don't think it's the internet's fault. In 1941 a couple of friends made a few phone calls to newspaper sports desks and concocted a college football team: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/16/sports/ncaafootball/the-41...

The point isn't that this is uniquely a product of the internet; it's that the internet (and the other features of the Information Age in general) magnify our ability to propagate inaccuracies, fruth-y myths, and blatant falsehoods faster, more widely, and more convincingly than ever before.

Re: How I turned “Street Sharks” into an online social experiment

#109

In my opinion, this prank is very intricate and took a lot of effort while not actually proving the point that "history is meaningless on the internet" because the subject matter - the Street Sharks - are/were essentially forgotten by history itself. Sometimes things just naturally slide away and nobody cares. It's like, "What year did the black Power Ranger turn good?" or "What was the top selling Rock band in the y…

> "What year did the black Power Ranger turn good?" Was the black power ranger ever bad? I recall the green ranger going bad, then later returning, reformed, as the white ranger. Or was mixing up the colors intentional to further your point?

Honestly I don't really remember and was just trying to throw out a subjective memory example. Black, Green, whatever. If it helped make my point I can say it was unintentional!

Re: How I turned “Street Sharks” into an online social experiment

#110

In my opinion, this prank is very intricate and took a lot of effort while not actually proving the point that "history is meaningless on the internet" because the subject matter - the Street Sharks - are/were essentially forgotten by history itself. Sometimes things just naturally slide away and nobody cares. It's like, "What year did the black Power Ranger turn good?" or "What was the top selling Rock band in the y…

> "What year did the black Power Ranger turn good?" Was the black power ranger ever bad? I recall the green ranger going bad, then later returning, reformed, as the white ranger. Or was mixing up the colors intentional to further your point?

The episode was Season 5 Episode 14 "Once You Go Black, You Never Go Back".

In the season finale, Zack absorbs Rita's evil power crystal and turns on the Power Rangers and Angel Grove. Zordon informs the Power Rangers of a secret cave containing the reversal crystal, but Rita and her Octopig monster have other plans. Can the Power Rangers morph in time to save Zack and Angel Grove?

Post reply on HN