Reading this felt kind of like the first time I read a writeup on Bitcoin. There's the same sense of throwing out some old, formerly immutable rules here, the excitement of something that's going to test some boundaries and inevitably clash with some authority (how can you, for instance, comply with the EU's "right to be forgotten" when that information is scattered into a redundant mesh?). Interesting times ahead fo…
Thanks for the kind words. :) Come join us! https://github.com/ipfs/
Neocities is implementing IPFS – distributed, permanent web
101–110 of 249 posts
Re: Neocities is implementing IPFS – distributed, permanent web
#102Re: Neocities is implementing IPFS – distributed, permanent web
#103Earlier quoted context omitted.
The "right to be forgotten" applies to any information service, not just search engines. However, search engines are often easier legal targets since they do business in the EU and thus can be made subject to EU law. If I have no business in the EU, and post my website on a non-EU hosting provider, EU law can demand I take down a page but has no jurisdiction to force me or force my provider. But e.g. Google, since th…
As far as I'm aware that's simply not true. See http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/files/factsheets... Furthermore the right to be forgotten only mandates hiding results when someone searches specifically for a name, for example. The results are still allowed to come up for unrelated search terms.
The court judgement - http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document_print.jsf?doc... - paragraph 26 says "As regards in particular the internet, the Court has already had occasion to state that the operation of loading personal data on an internet page must be considered to be such ‘processing’ within the meaning of Article 2(b) of Directive 95/46" - so by the Court's reasoning the Directive potentially applies to any web page, not just search engines.
Re: Neocities is implementing IPFS – distributed, permanent web
#104Re: Neocities is implementing IPFS – distributed, permanent web
#105Reading this felt kind of like the first time I read a writeup on Bitcoin. There's the same sense of throwing out some old, formerly immutable rules here, the excitement of something that's going to test some boundaries and inevitably clash with some authority (how can you, for instance, comply with the EU's "right to be forgotten" when that information is scattered into a redundant mesh?). Interesting times ahead fo…
Re: Neocities is implementing IPFS – distributed, permanent web
#106Re: Neocities is implementing IPFS – distributed, permanent web
#107Re: Neocities is implementing IPFS – distributed, permanent web
#108Re: Neocities is implementing IPFS – distributed, permanent web
#109While IPFS can certainly complement HTTP (for example in preventing censorship in states such as China), it will not replace HTTP. Decentralization does not work with centralized services (99% of the web) such as Twitter, Google, etc. You'll need HTTP to run server code. I for one will not be hosting a node where arbitrary code can be run. Besides the obvious fact that a centralized service wants to control what serv…
Re: Neocities is implementing IPFS – distributed, permanent web
#110Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thanks! Help us make it :) -- https://github.com/ipfs/ and, you'll love what we have coming. Soon, you won't need to install ipfs at all :D
Are you talking implementing IPFS on the browser level? Is there public code yet?
It's coming along, not fully functional yet but you can watch its progress (or contribute code :D ) at https://github.com/ipfs/node-ipfs