Similar to the article linked in the post, SCOTUS has started clamping down on these sorts of patents.[0] I suspect this one will also be killed eventually. It's really a shame that the patent office is still giving out these sorts of patents, however, and wasting everyone's time and effort. [0] http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/09/supreme-court-rul...
EFF's Stupid Patent of the Month: Do It with a Computer
11–19 of 19 posts
Re: EFF's Stupid Patent of the Month: Do It with a Computer
#12They really need to find a way of firing patent examiners who grant these sort of patents. I'm fairly certain that would help reduce the amount of patents granted,
Re: EFF's Stupid Patent of the Month: Do It with a Computer
#13Re: EFF's Stupid Patent of the Month: Do It with a Computer
#14"teledildonics" - nice, I might add this as a skill to my linkedin
Re: EFF's Stupid Patent of the Month: Do It with a Computer
#15Perhaps someone should patent a process for generating 'do X on a computer' patents?
Re: EFF's Stupid Patent of the Month: Do It with a Computer
#16Re: EFF's Stupid Patent of the Month: Do It with a Computer
#17Re: EFF's Stupid Patent of the Month: Do It with a Computer
#18"teledildonics" - nice, I might add this as a skill to my linkedin
So long as there's no negativity (or serious economics) HN users are welcome to comment as if they're 12.
Re: EFF's Stupid Patent of the Month: Do It with a Computer
#19Perhaps someone should patent a process for generating 'do X on a computer' patents?
That's actually not a bad idea. Keep making patents that are as stupid as possible in order to force a change in policy or legislation. Unfortunately the cost would probably make it unfeasible.