Live data from Hacker News

EFF's Stupid Patent of the Month: Do It with a Computer

eff.org

11–19 of 19 posts

Re: EFF's Stupid Patent of the Month: Do It with a Computer

#11

Similar to the article linked in the post, SCOTUS has started clamping down on these sorts of patents.[0] I suspect this one will also be killed eventually. It's really a shame that the patent office is still giving out these sorts of patents, however, and wasting everyone's time and effort. [0] http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/09/supreme-court-rul...

But how many millions of dollars will potentially be wasted until it gets killed?

Re: EFF's Stupid Patent of the Month: Do It with a Computer

#12

They really need to find a way of firing patent examiners who grant these sort of patents. I'm fairly certain that would help reduce the amount of patents granted,

A way was not yet found to fire Madoff's regulators. (In fact a way should have been found to put them behind bars for a couple of decades.) So regarding firing patent examiners, I'm not holding my breath.

Re: EFF's Stupid Patent of the Month: Do It with a Computer

#17
You know, it's really funny that everyone knocks these patents (and rightly so), but the second some service comes up that does the same stuff as has been done before, but suddenly it's "on an app!" that means it's revolutionary, and old regulations shouldn't apply to it.

Re: EFF's Stupid Patent of the Month: Do It with a Computer

#18
post #3

"teledildonics" - nice, I might add this as a skill to my linkedin

Great comment, it's good to see what kind of quality HN is striving for by which comments they choose to keep and which they choose to downvote.

So long as there's no negativity (or serious economics) HN users are welcome to comment as if they're 12.

Re: EFF's Stupid Patent of the Month: Do It with a Computer

#19

Perhaps someone should patent a process for generating 'do X on a computer' patents?

Or even "method for submitting a patent application over the Internet!" If you actually managed to get it, that might actually be stupid enough to get some legislation passed. At minimum it would halt patent applications for a while until it is thrown out.

That's actually not a bad idea. Keep making patents that are as stupid as possible in order to force a change in policy or legislation. Unfortunately the cost would probably make it unfeasible.

Post reply on HN