My name is only real enough to work at Facebook, not to use on the site
11–20 of 54 posts
Re: My name is only real enough to work at Facebook, not to use on the site
#12Re: My name is only real enough to work at Facebook, not to use on the site
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
I just stopped caring about being invited to "events". If the event is so impersonal that it needs to be broadcast rather than two or three people organizing and then blasting a simple text message like "Hey beers at 5PM at . Come if you can!" I just don't care.
[deleted]
Please don't be personally rude in HN comments. This comment would be fine without that bit.
Re: My name is only real enough to work at Facebook, not to use on the site
#14Assigning the right amount of power for an automatic filter is a science itself, though. Heuristic AV scanners and spam filters suffer from the same issues.
For example even big telco providers (Ay Yildiz Germany) get caught up for now MONTHS in Gmails spam filter with no way to change this. Their emails are discarded already at SMTP delivery...
Re: My name is only real enough to work at Facebook, not to use on the site
#15Re: My name is only real enough to work at Facebook, not to use on the site
#16Re: My name is only real enough to work at Facebook, not to use on the site
#17I guess this is the work of a bunch of trans-haters abusing the report feature. Assigning the right amount of power for an automatic filter is a science itself, though. Heuristic AV scanners and spam filters suffer from the same issues. For example even big telco providers (Ay Yildiz Germany) get caught up for now MONTHS in Gmails spam filter with no way to change this. Their emails are discarded already at SMTP deli…
Re: My name is only real enough to work at Facebook, not to use on the site
#18Re: My name is only real enough to work at Facebook, not to use on the site
#19Re: My name is only real enough to work at Facebook, not to use on the site
#20I guess this is the work of a bunch of trans-haters abusing the report feature. Assigning the right amount of power for an automatic filter is a science itself, though. Heuristic AV scanners and spam filters suffer from the same issues. For example even big telco providers (Ay Yildiz Germany) get caught up for now MONTHS in Gmails spam filter with no way to change this. Their emails are discarded already at SMTP deli…
I have my doubts about that since they also seem to go on spurts of banning Native American using their real names.
1.1bn gives a pretty exhaustive list of common names for a given country region.