Live data from Hacker News

Re: Cease and Desist Notice – Infringement of Copyright

archive.org

11–16 of 16 posts

Re: Re: Cease and Desist Notice – Infringement of Copyright

#11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A lawyer in India sent a cease and desist email to a developer (in, I'm assuming, India) for posting javascript that's being used as an injection attack (for a mobile network provider) against insecure http requests, under the guise of "service enhancement". https://github.com/thejeshgn/airtel-3g-script-injection "The said code is closed source software and our client is sole proprietor of the same. Therefore, no one…

The said code is closed source software They can invoke the proprietary/copyright claims, but saying that JS is "closed source" just doesn't make sense when the source code is what gets distributed. IMHO it's the same situation with HTML and CSS. (IANAL, etc.)

Unless you have the right to do so because you are the copyright holder or have a licence you can't distribute code no matter whether you have access to the code or not.

Re: Re: Cease and Desist Notice – Infringement of Copyright

#12
post #2

As much as I hate to use this on HN, could someone ELI5 this for me - I get what a C and D is, why is this relevant?

First off, I had to navigate to this link[0] before I could read the pdf properly. Archive.org seems to be going through a redesign. What makes this C&D seem asinine to me is that one of his "infringing" artifacts is a screenshot[1] of Chrome viewing their website's source code. [0] https://archive.org/stream/LEGALNOTICETOTHEJESHGNCEASEANDDES... [1] https://github.com/thejeshgn/airtel-3g-script-injection/blob...

Thanks. I was initially confused about why archive.org's redesign announcement was named Re: Cease and Desist Notice – Infringement of Copyright, and then I was further confused when the HN comments appeared to be about something else entirely.

Re: Re: Cease and Desist Notice – Infringement of Copyright

#14
the whole story is covered here, http://thewire.in/2015/06/09/israeli-firm-strong-arms-indian...

Airtel which is a popular telecom provider in India with millions of subscribers is injecting javascript code into its user's content unknown to its users. This is being done to show them ad. This completely breaks NetNeutrality as ISP shouldnt play any role in modifying content of the user. It is doing this using services of an Israeli company which means all the browsing session information is being shared with them in some or other way which completely compromises the user's privacy. This is very ugly and that now the company is trying to arm-twist the developer who found to cover it up is worse. In India, privacy laws are not well defined and unless there is some people's action on the street about this, there is a good chance it will be just buried. No hopes from the current government which is busy cosying up private companies in whatever way it can.

Re: Re: Cease and Desist Notice – Infringement of Copyright

#15
post #2

As much as I hate to use this on HN, could someone ELI5 this for me - I get what a C and D is, why is this relevant?

A lawyer in India sent a cease and desist email to a developer (in, I'm assuming, India) for posting javascript that's being used as an injection attack (for a mobile network provider) against insecure http requests, under the guise of "service enhancement". https://github.com/thejeshgn/airtel-3g-script-injection "The said code is closed source software and our client is sole proprietor of the same. Therefore, no one…

I don't think you can copyright code in india as abstract concepts are not patentable as per constitution.

Re: Re: Cease and Desist Notice – Infringement of Copyright

#16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The said code is closed source software They can invoke the proprietary/copyright claims, but saying that JS is "closed source" just doesn't make sense when the source code is what gets distributed. IMHO it's the same situation with HTML and CSS. (IANAL, etc.)

How does copyright work in India? Any fair use exemptions?

There are fair-use exemptions, but when it comes to computer software, these exemptions suddenly become zero. Making a disclosure and proving a security/privacy flaw becomes extremely difficult.
Post reply on HN