It doesn´t seem to support the jQuery .ajax() method, I hope its added soon
Agreed, ajax is usually the reason I just think fuck it and add jQuery
Sprint – A high-performance, DOM library for modern browsers
11–20 of 72 posts
Re: Sprint – A high-performance, DOM library for modern browsers
#12 A tiny, lightning fast jQuery-like library for modern browsers.
Respectfully, this entire description is an oxymoron. Every time someone mentions a jQuery-like microlibrary, they just mean a jQuery without wide browser(-quirk) support.Browser support is a big part of what makes jQuery jQuery, and without it, you definitely get a much smaller library, but it is also very un-jQuery-like. :)
Now for some praise! It makes me really happy to see a comparison - benchmark! - with competitors, which is something everyone should be required to do, when they create software with 40,000 similar offerings. Looking at you, Markdown editors!
Re: Sprint – A high-performance, DOM library for modern browsers
#13Re: Sprint – A high-performance, DOM library for modern browsers
#14I am tired of terribly slow mobile sites. A demo of the difference would help.
Sprint (phone): 33.1 kops
jquery (phone): 8.8 kops
zepto (phone): 10.1 kops
Sprint (laptop): 1435.2 kops
jquery (laptop): 49.2 kops
zepto (laptop): 65.9 kops
Not bad, if that translates to real world performance.Re: Sprint – A high-performance, DOM library for modern browsers
#15A tiny, lightning fast jQuery-like library for modern browsers. Respectfully, this entire description is an oxymoron. Every time someone mentions a jQuery-like microlibrary, they just mean a jQuery without wide browser(-quirk) support. Browser support is a big part of what makes jQuery jQuery, and without it, you definitely get a much smaller library, but it is also very un-jQuery-like. :) Now for some praise! It mak…
I'm curious if it will take jQuery plugins though. Will try later.
Re: Sprint – A high-performance, DOM library for modern browsers
#16A tiny, lightning fast jQuery-like library for modern browsers. Respectfully, this entire description is an oxymoron. Every time someone mentions a jQuery-like microlibrary, they just mean a jQuery without wide browser(-quirk) support. Browser support is a big part of what makes jQuery jQuery, and without it, you definitely get a much smaller library, but it is also very un-jQuery-like. :) Now for some praise! It mak…
In a horrendously framgented mobile internet, one of the few blessings we do have is that the vast majority of mobile web browsers are WebKit variants so this kind of makes a lot of sense if, say, you're only targeting iOS and Android default browsers. I'm curious if it will take jQuery plugins though. Will try later.
Re: Sprint – A high-performance, DOM library for modern browsers
#17A tiny, lightning fast jQuery-like library for modern browsers. Respectfully, this entire description is an oxymoron. Every time someone mentions a jQuery-like microlibrary, they just mean a jQuery without wide browser(-quirk) support. Browser support is a big part of what makes jQuery jQuery, and without it, you definitely get a much smaller library, but it is also very un-jQuery-like. :) Now for some praise! It mak…
Though JQuery still recommends the bigger library for most users (unless you're embedding in a mobile app or stuff like that).
Re: Sprint – A high-performance, DOM library for modern browsers
#18A tiny, lightning fast jQuery-like library for modern browsers. Respectfully, this entire description is an oxymoron. Every time someone mentions a jQuery-like microlibrary, they just mean a jQuery without wide browser(-quirk) support. Browser support is a big part of what makes jQuery jQuery, and without it, you definitely get a much smaller library, but it is also very un-jQuery-like. :) Now for some praise! It mak…
Re: Sprint – A high-performance, DOM library for modern browsers
#19It doesn´t seem to support the jQuery .ajax() method, I hope its added soon
Agreed, ajax is usually the reason I just think fuck it and add jQuery
Re: Sprint – A high-performance, DOM library for modern browsers
#20This only supports IE10+. Why shouldn't I just use Javascript directly?