Live data from Hacker News

Seth Godin: Hammer Time

sethgodin.typepad.com

11–16 of 16 posts

Re: Seth Godin: Hammer Time

#11
post #8
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You shouldn't fabricate a screwdriver! You should fabricate a screwdriver building factory http://discuss.joelonsoftware.com/default.asp?joel.3.219431....

You shouldn't fabricate a screwdriver building factory! you should fabricate a tool fabrication factory factory!

Ah, just have a go at the whole late 19th century equivalent industrial infrastructure. It'll be fun!

Re: Seth Godin: Hammer Time

#12
Not a bad point. People tend to solve problems in the way that they tend to build problems (tautologically.)

At least in my own experience, engineers tend to solve problems by building things to solve the problems. Sometimes the answer is to remove parts until those problems don't exist.

Re: Seth Godin: Hammer Time

#13
post #4

A nice point, but isn't this post a bit hollow? After all, you'd expect someone like Seth Godin to put forward a well-supported argument about a radically new approach (new hammer) and its benefits?

He said himself a while back that he makes his blog posts short on purpose so that his point doesn't get dilluted in a sea of text.

FWIW, I think the point wasn't to suggest that there is some new hammer; just that you should be aware that there's a very high chance you're not seeing a bigger picture due to confirmation bias or whatever.

Re: Seth Godin: Hammer Time

#14
Neat base idea, but the blog post is just business porn. He's just restating the old adage about getting stuck in ruts.

The key skills is being able to tell when you're stuck using hammer because it's what you're familiar with, and he doesn't discuss that at all.

Re: Seth Godin: Hammer Time

#16
post #9
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>> A nice point, but isn't this post a bit hollow? It is, but I find all of Seth's posts are this way. He is good at formulating ideas which seems obvious after you read them. ;-) But I don't consider him being some deep thinker who could put forward some "radically new approach".

It is astrology for intellectuals.

Academia (mostly) is astrology for intellectuals; management is astrology for not-quite-intellectuals.
Post reply on HN