Three Types of Harmful Hackathons
11–20 of 55 posts
Re: Three Types of Harmful Hackathons
#12Quick edit: Just wanted to say that I see this more as my failing to understand what SW was instead of me blaming SW for not meeting my incorrect expectations. SW is fine but it's just probably not for me.
Re: Three Types of Harmful Hackathons
#13Running a Hackathon costs money. We can have a hackathon where: - The costs are split up by the number of participants. - A bunch of teams participate. - Everyone builds whatever they want, and they own it. - There can be multiple show-and-tells, to allow teams to ask / answer questions, get to know each-other, and iterate. - Everyone walks away having made some wonderful new friends, having learned a thing or two, a…
Disclaimer I help organize the described at the bottom of the article.
Re: Three Types of Harmful Hackathons
#14Since the general HN consensus on such things is "execution > idea" is it all right if a hackathon says "We might use your idea in our products"?
PS. Obviously, it's never OK if they say "We own your idea and you can't use it anymore".
Re: Three Types of Harmful Hackathons
#15Last Startup Weekend I went to had 7 devs out of 110 people. Definitely an issue. EDIT: All but one of the 11 teams were tech/programming required startups guys. I'm not talking about "Startup Weekend" as a whole, I'm talking about my experience at the event I went to.
Does Start Up weekend specifies that the start up has to do with tech? Unless you're saying that 103 people were the "idea person" I don't see what's wrong with that
Re: Three Types of Harmful Hackathons
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
I can't speak for all Startup Weekend events, but at the one I went too, every single project was a tech startup. On the team I was on, the vibe from the "idea person" was definitely "How can I get a developer to help me for free?"
from the blog post: >Restrict to those who are there to code, design, or build something, not to write a business plan - this gives participants the freedom to work on projects that don't need to have profit potential. That makes sense, but you know, don't restrict it to tech start ups. And from what I read at the SW website, it DOESN'T have to be tech. How were the projects from that SW you mention?
Re: Three Types of Harmful Hackathons
#17I've done Startup Weekend once before and it felt like how the "The Business-A-Thon" was described. My friends and I did not know this would be the case going in and spent all of our time pumping out an MVP (which worked!) while the teams that won largely didn't have ANY code to show for their time. It was all slides and marketing talk. The winner DID have code but it was a It was a pretty big letdown and I haven't b…
"Whoah, I want that!" > "Yes, that is functional."
Re: Three Types of Harmful Hackathons
#18I've done Startup Weekend once before and it felt like how the "The Business-A-Thon" was described. My friends and I did not know this would be the case going in and spent all of our time pumping out an MVP (which worked!) while the teams that won largely didn't have ANY code to show for their time. It was all slides and marketing talk. The winner DID have code but it was a It was a pretty big letdown and I haven't b…
Re: Three Types of Harmful Hackathons
#19I've done Startup Weekend once before and it felt like how the "The Business-A-Thon" was described. My friends and I did not know this would be the case going in and spent all of our time pumping out an MVP (which worked!) while the teams that won largely didn't have ANY code to show for their time. It was all slides and marketing talk. The winner DID have code but it was a It was a pretty big letdown and I haven't b…
I haven't been to a SW in about 3 years. But the last ones I went to were all people who brought their existing fledgling business they were trying to get started. Did who knows what for the weekend. Then just pitched it on demo day. That was maybe 60% of the groups that participated. Really a big let down.
Re: Three Types of Harmful Hackathons
#20I've done Startup Weekend once before and it felt like how the "The Business-A-Thon" was described. My friends and I did not know this would be the case going in and spent all of our time pumping out an MVP (which worked!) while the teams that won largely didn't have ANY code to show for their time. It was all slides and marketing talk. The winner DID have code but it was a It was a pretty big letdown and I haven't b…
To be fair, SW is meant to be a "Business-A-Thon" and not a hackathon in the traditional sense. This is spelled out in many places, and they make it clear up front that the business plan is key.
> I also understand that maybe SW is not aimed at being a hackathon but I just wish they could have given more weight to something that worked and was accessible today
But that's not what they want to be. I'm not saying you have to like it, but rather that your perceptions going into SW was for it to be something it didn't want to be.