Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Twitter’s Got a New Harassment Problem: Periscope

blog.embed.ly

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

11–18 of 18 posts

Re: Twitter’s Got a New Harassment Problem: Periscope

#11

Post by AustinScript »

VLM wrote: post #6

The logic is a bit mystifying, in the same article you have "When you hop into Periscope, you see streams from all around the world. From an engagement perspective, this is fantastic." right next to "There where only about 12 viewers of this stream, meaning a quarter of users watching were there to do harm." On what planet of 6 billion people, is having two-billionths of the population tune in where most of them are…

A single stream had 12 viewers watching, the site is composed of multiple streams.

Perhaps the point was people from all over the world are using it rather than the product being popular only in a single region of the world?

I'd say your logic is more misguided then mystifying.

(P.S. - The world population is closer to 7 billion)

Re: Twitter’s Got a New Harassment Problem: Periscope

#12

Post by borgia »

I'm of two minds about this. Periscope, and indeed any other publicly social media, is an opt-in service. By using it you're saying "I want attention | I want to draw attention to myself | I want to draw attention to something". By publicly social media I mean publicly accessible Twitter accounts and similar, not private Facebook accounts.

People in the "public eye" invariably draw positive and negative attention. Does what amounts to narcissism need to be further coddled by essentially automatically filtering out negativity?

I understand that the tool could do with some work for private/family/friend only streaming or similar, but if you're going to put yourself out into the public forefront you should be able to take the good with the bad.

Cyberbullying is rampant, it's a big issue, but it's not a technology issue. The issue is with the people using it. For every kid that's experiencing cyberbullying there's another kid on the opposite end bullying them online. Let's stop trying to push responsibility onto the platform provider and instead focus on the people involved.

Re: Twitter’s Got a New Harassment Problem: Periscope

#13

Post by strictnein »

pjc50 wrote: post #10
grandalf wrote: post #3

It was interesting the other evening to watch "ask a black guy anything" and to see some pretty hateful racist comments get posted. The guy handled it well but it was clear that some of the viewers were trying to goad him. There would be three easy solutions: 1) allow broadcasters to turn off comments entirely (only allowing hearts) 2) allow broadcasters to make comments visible only to themselves, to reduce the ince…

4) Have an AUP and actually ban violators 5) Support shared blocklists

Disagree with #5 strongly. Shared blocklists are a great way to create echo chambers. The unofficial ones are already causing problems.

Of the people I follow on Twitter, a surprising number of fairly mainstream journalists are finding themselves blocked by people they have never interacted with.

Re: Twitter’s Got a New Harassment Problem: Periscope

#14

Post by igorgue »

By FAR! "That's the internet" is the real explanation of this.

When I get annoyed at this kind of stuff one of my best friends always tell me "don't be a little bitch"... And it's true, since the very beginning of the internet as we know it there has always been harassment, the only opinion about yourself that matters is yours.

And really if you get annoyed at this, you can always choose not to use this software. Same way you choose not to go to /b/. Don't be entitled to make the software work for you, and likely Twitter makes more money from trolls than from whiners.

I don't know if it's a culture thing but you guys (mostly west coast people) have a very thin skin and just take yourself way too seriously.

Guess what? I found all the comments funny and entertaining.

Re: Twitter’s Got a New Harassment Problem: Periscope

#15

Post by doki_pen »

igorgue wrote: post #14

By FAR! "That's the internet" is the real explanation of this. When I get annoyed at this kind of stuff one of my best friends always tell me "don't be a little bitch"... And it's true, since the very beginning of the internet as we know it there has always been harassment, the only opinion about yourself that matters is yours. And really if you get annoyed at this, you can always choose not to use this software. Sam…

Even the one that said, "Can fat girls wear buns?". I have a pretty good sense of humor, but I was puzzled by that "joke".

Re: Twitter’s Got a New Harassment Problem: Periscope

#16

Post by migueldeicaza »

strictnein wrote: post #13
pjc50 wrote: post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

4) Have an AUP and actually ban violators 5) Support shared blocklists

Disagree with #5 strongly. Shared blocklists are a great way to create echo chambers. The unofficial ones are already causing problems. Of the people I follow on Twitter, a surprising number of fairly mainstream journalists are finding themselves blocked by people they have never interacted with.

Not really.

The echo chamber is only an issue if you isolate everything. But given the hundreds of thousands of disparate communities, blocking one or two, or even dozens of groups does not amount to much towards creating an echo chamber.

Re: Twitter’s Got a New Harassment Problem: Periscope

#17

Post by strictnein »

migueldeicaza wrote: post #16
strictnein wrote: post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Disagree with #5 strongly. Shared blocklists are a great way to create echo chambers. The unofficial ones are already causing problems. Of the people I follow on Twitter, a surprising number of fairly mainstream journalists are finding themselves blocked by people they have never interacted with.

Not really. The echo chamber is only an issue if you isolate everything . But given the hundreds of thousands of disparate communities, blocking one or two, or even dozens of groups does not amount to much towards creating an echo chamber.

The blocklists are targeting people in the same communities, but who hold differing views, so it definitely is creating echo chambers. You don't need to isolate everything, just those holding opposing views in your community.
Post reply on HN