I own both an iphone and kindle. It's a lot easier to read for longer durations on the kindle due to the e-ink display. Also, the battery lasts a lot longer since the e-ink virtually consumes no static power. For now, in my opinion, the ebook edge goes to the kindle.
Agreed 100%. I get the feeling that many of the people who tout the iPhone/Tablet as an eBook reader have never tried a Kindle or something with e-ink. The experience just doesn't compare, and you don't have to worry about an hour of reading doing serious damage to your battery. Also I lost all respect for Om's analysis abilities after hearing him talk on This Week in Tech a month or two ago.
The Next Hot e-Reader: The iPhone
11–20 of 21 posts
Re: The Next Hot e-Reader: The iPhone
#12I can't believe Apple hasn't just built a standard "Books" app and added a Book Store alongside the App and Music stores. I suppose it's a licensing issue, but they already sell audiobooks, don't they?
Re: The Next Hot e-Reader: The iPhone
#13I can't believe Apple hasn't just built a standard "Books" app and added a Book Store alongside the App and Music stores. I suppose it's a licensing issue, but they already sell audiobooks, don't they?
http://www.mcelhearn.com/2004/12/17/organize-pdf-files-in-it...
Re: The Next Hot e-Reader: The iPhone
#14This single thing is preventing me from purchasing the iPhone. I have a lots of PDFs and need to read those over time.
Re: The Next Hot e-Reader: The iPhone
#15It's bad that you can't copy your PDFs into iPhone and read those later. Not unless it's jail broken. iPhone can render PDF, but only when the file is sent as mail attachment or downloaded from web. This single thing is preventing me from purchasing the iPhone. I have a lots of PDFs and need to read those over time.
Re: The Next Hot e-Reader: The iPhone
#16I can't believe Apple hasn't just built a standard "Books" app and added a Book Store alongside the App and Music stores. I suppose it's a licensing issue, but they already sell audiobooks, don't they?
A few years back the iTunes store used to sell pamphlets on things like how-tos as PDFs, but they seem to have gone now. http://www.mcelhearn.com/2004/12/17/organize-pdf-files-in-it...
Re: The Next Hot e-Reader: The iPhone
#17I own both an iphone and kindle. It's a lot easier to read for longer durations on the kindle due to the e-ink display. Also, the battery lasts a lot longer since the e-ink virtually consumes no static power. For now, in my opinion, the ebook edge goes to the kindle.
Agreed 100%. I get the feeling that many of the people who tout the iPhone/Tablet as an eBook reader have never tried a Kindle or something with e-ink. The experience just doesn't compare, and you don't have to worry about an hour of reading doing serious damage to your battery. Also I lost all respect for Om's analysis abilities after hearing him talk on This Week in Tech a month or two ago.
Also, the battery consumption for just reading isn't that bad. I've found that the battery drains the quickest when wi-fi is on or playing intensive games. I, personally, wouldn't be worried about battery life when reading a book.
(Man, what has the world come to! I'm becoming an Apple apologist!)
Re: The Next Hot e-Reader: The iPhone
#18I read mostly in the bus to work. I'm always carrying my phone, a kindle or a paperback book would be a big extra thing to carry along.
One win for the e-ink display would be that it'd be readable in bright sunlight, unlike the active display of the phone.
Re: The Next Hot e-Reader: The iPhone
#19It's bad that you can't copy your PDFs into iPhone and read those later. Not unless it's jail broken. iPhone can render PDF, but only when the file is sent as mail attachment or downloaded from web. This single thing is preventing me from purchasing the iPhone. I have a lots of PDFs and need to read those over time.
1. Sign up for Dropbox, if you haven't already; put PDFs you want to read into your Dropbox, and, obviously, buy an iPhone.
2. Install the Dropbox iPhone app.
3. In the Dropbox iPhone app, mark the PDFs as "favorites," and they'll be synced to the iPhone's drive, accessible whether or not the phone is online.
There are all the "network drive" applications as well, of course, but I think this is the best of both worlds: if you're at home the LAN sync will negate any extra bandwidth usage, while if you're out somewhere you can still pull the file from the network (once) and then keep it stored locally from then on. Then again, you can't do the "promiscuous sharing to anything around me that can speak Bonjour" this way, but I'm guessing you probably don't want people pirating books off your phone anyway :)
Re: The Next Hot e-Reader: The iPhone
#20I own both an iphone and kindle. It's a lot easier to read for longer durations on the kindle due to the e-ink display. Also, the battery lasts a lot longer since the e-ink virtually consumes no static power. For now, in my opinion, the ebook edge goes to the kindle.
Agreed 100%. I get the feeling that many of the people who tout the iPhone/Tablet as an eBook reader have never tried a Kindle or something with e-ink. The experience just doesn't compare, and you don't have to worry about an hour of reading doing serious damage to your battery. Also I lost all respect for Om's analysis abilities after hearing him talk on This Week in Tech a month or two ago.
For awhile, I had both a Sony Reader (e-ink) and an iPhone. While sitting around and reading linearly for an extended period was much better on the Reader, I found that the iPhone was worlds better as an eReader for reference material. This is not so much because the iPhone is so great as a reader -- really, with its small screen size and backlit LCD screen, it leaves a lot to be desired. However the iPhone is so much more interactive. And when using reference materials, one is very much interacting. (Searching, flipping, zooming)
I keep waiting for someone to produce a device for me to compile my own content in the form of reference materials. It has to be large enough to read comfortably, interactive enough to enable quick "flipping" and searching, yet light enough to carry everywhere. It should also be an "instant-on" device. So far, I've not found a device to satisfy me.
As for Om's analysis, I think the best way to judge a pundit is to hold some specialized knowledge about an obscure but interesting corner of programming. Then you can see if they have real insight, or if they're just selling a bill of goods that the mainstream will buy.