Out of curiosity, why the title 700 Billion? What is the purpose of this in how it relates to the article? Regarding the article, yea, seems pretty standard. Sorry you didn't get the job
My experience of interviewing for a job at Apple
11–20 of 295 posts
Re: My experience of interviewing for a job at Apple
#12"Talent Shortage"
(the question of whether companies actually need employees of that caliber for building mobile apps is a entirely different one)
Re: My experience of interviewing for a job at Apple
#13 Note: after 25 minutes answering questions for a job you really
want it’s kinda hard to shift to a question-asking mode.
When I was looking for a job I found that it helped enormously to write down a set of questions ahead of time.Some I liked:
What does a typical day look like for you?
What projects do you work on?
How long have you been at $company? How has your role changed since then?
If I were hired for this role, what would my first day/week/month look like?
Is there anything about $company that some people really like, but others might dislike? (For example, having an open-plan office.)
What tools do you use on a regular basis?
Re: My experience of interviewing for a job at Apple
#14Idk. Flaunting how much the process cost and how much income it lost was sort of put off for me. It's great to see insight into interviews, in general, but that just left a weird bitter note to the article.
Luis might have very well been looking for work during this time, but by phrasing it as an outright monetary loss, he exaggerates his sacrifice and gives an appeal to the reader to condemn what Apple "did to him."I believe this is the reason also for the "700 Billion". Oh well. Sucks to be rejected. Natural reaction
Re: My experience of interviewing for a job at Apple
#15Out of curiosity, why the title 700 Billion? What is the purpose of this in how it relates to the article? Regarding the article, yea, seems pretty standard. Sorry you didn't get the job
"A few people asked me to write about my experience of interviewing for a job at Apple—the 700 billion worth company—so here it is."
Re: My experience of interviewing for a job at Apple
#16At the end of the day, it comes down to being able to truly connect with your interviewers and breaking out of the typical question-answer format. It sounds like you almost reached that point - I'm not sure if the lunch was a standard thing they did with all applicants, but it did seem like they were really interested in you. It could be that the process came down to a handful of equally desirable candidates, at which point luck plays a large role in deciding who gets the job. I would definitely keep in touch with everyone you met, and apply again at the next opportunity.
Re: My experience of interviewing for a job at Apple
#17Re: My experience of interviewing for a job at Apple
#18Note: after 25 minutes answering questions for a job you really want it’s kinda hard to shift to a question-asking mode. When I was looking for a job I found that it helped enormously to write down a set of questions ahead of time. Some I liked: What does a typical day look like for you? What projects do you work on? How long have you been at $company? How has your role changed since then? If I were hired for this ro…
Re: My experience of interviewing for a job at Apple
#19Note: after 25 minutes answering questions for a job you really want it’s kinda hard to shift to a question-asking mode. When I was looking for a job I found that it helped enormously to write down a set of questions ahead of time. Some I liked: What does a typical day look like for you? What projects do you work on? How long have you been at $company? How has your role changed since then? If I were hired for this ro…
Re: My experience of interviewing for a job at Apple
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
"A few people asked me to write about my experience of interviewing for a job at Apple—the 700 billion worth company—so here it is."
I still don't understand, but ok, thanks. That's a great descriptor of Apple (of which there are many), but doesn't point anywhere toward a rationale for titling an interview experience as "700 billion". I'm not trying to say titles need to make logical sense, but they usually should make some sense